Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
Commission File Numbers: 333-72440
333-72440-01
Mediacom Broadband LLC
Mediacom Broadband Corporation*
(Exact names of Registrants as specified in their charters)
|
|
|
Delaware
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
06-1615412
06-1630167
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification Numbers) |
100 Crystal Run Road
Middletown, New York 10941
(Address of principal executive offices)
(845) 695-2600
(Registrants telephone number)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the Registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. o Yes þ No
Note: As a voluntary filer, not subject to the filing requirements, the Registrants have filed all
reports under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months.
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrants have submitted electronically and posted on their
respective corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and
posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the Registrants were required to submit and post such
files). o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrants are large accelerated filers, accelerated filers,
non-accelerated filers, or smaller reporting companies. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o Large accelerated filer
|
|
o Accelerated filer
|
|
þ Non-accelerated filer
|
|
o Smaller reporting company |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrants are shell companies (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of the Registrants common stock: Not Applicable
|
|
|
* |
|
Mediacom Broadband Corporation meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction H (1)
(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this form with the reduced disclosure format. |
MEDIACOM BROADBAND LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. Any
statement contained in a prior periodic report shall be deemed to be modified or superseded for
purposes of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the extent that a statement contained herein
modifies or supersedes such statement. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) allows us to
incorporate by reference information that we file with them, which means that we can disclose
important information to you by referring you directly to those documents. Information incorporated
by reference is considered to be part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In addition,
information that we file with the SEC in the future will automatically update and supersede
information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Throughout this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q, we refer to Mediacom Broadband as Mediacom; and Mediacom and its consolidated
subsidiaries as we, us and our.
2
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
You should carefully review the information contained in this Quarterly Report and in other reports
or documents that we file from time to time with the SEC.
In this Quarterly Report, we state our beliefs of future events and of our future financial
performance. In some cases, you can identify those so-called forward-looking statements by words
such as anticipates, believes, continue, estimates, expects, may, plans, potential,
predicts, should or will, or the negative of those words and other comparable words. These
forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results
to differ materially from historical results or those we anticipate, many of which are beyond our
control. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from those contained in the
forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: competition for video, high-speed data
and phone customers; our ability to achieve anticipated customer and revenue growth and to
successfully introduce new products and services; greater than anticipated effects of economic
downturns and other factors which may negatively affect our customers demand for our products and
services; increasing programming costs and delivery expenses related to our products and services;
changes in consumer preferences, laws and regulations or technology that may cause us to change our
operational strategies; changes in assumptions underlying our critical accounting polices which
could impact our results; fluctuations in short term interest rates which may cause our interest
expense to vary from quarter to quarter; our ability to generate sufficient cash flow to meet our
debt service obligations; instability in the credit markets, which may impact our ability to
refinance our debt on the same, or similar terms as we currently experience, as our revolving
credit facility expires in December 2012; and the other risks and uncertainties discussed in this
Quarterly Report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and
other reports or documents that we file from time to time with the SEC. Statements included in this
Quarterly Report are based upon information known to us as of the date that this Quarterly Report
is filed with the SEC, and we assume no obligation to update or alter our forward-looking
statements made in this Quarterly Report, whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise, except as required by applicable federal securities laws.
3
PART I
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
MEDIACOM BROADBAND LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(All dollar amounts in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
14,088 |
|
|
$ |
15,502 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,410 and $1,688 |
|
|
49,317 |
|
|
|
46,671 |
|
Accounts receivable affiliates |
|
|
150,595 |
|
|
|
141,161 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
11,423 |
|
|
|
8,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
225,423 |
|
|
|
211,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in cable television systems: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of
accumulated depreciation of $784,203 and $705,983 |
|
|
734,342 |
|
|
|
749,066 |
|
Franchise rights |
|
|
1,176,908 |
|
|
|
1,247,435 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
182,924 |
|
|
|
204,005 |
|
Subscriber lists, net of accumulated amortization of $34,155 and $25,788 |
|
|
5,592 |
|
|
|
7,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment in cable television systems |
|
|
2,099,766 |
|
|
|
2,207,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets, net of accumulated amortization of $9,350 and $7,481 |
|
|
24,025 |
|
|
|
24,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,349,214 |
|
|
$ |
2,444,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES, PREFERRED MEMBERS INTEREST AND MEMBERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
$ |
146,299 |
|
|
$ |
147,371 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
31,162 |
|
|
|
30,427 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
76,750 |
|
|
|
94,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
254,211 |
|
|
|
271,798 |
|
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
|
1,779,250 |
|
|
|
1,702,000 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
12,638 |
|
|
|
23,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,046,099 |
|
|
|
1,997,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PREFERRED MEMBERS INTEREST (Note 6) |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MEMBERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contributions |
|
|
444,233 |
|
|
|
634,910 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(291,118 |
) |
|
|
(338,447 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total members equity |
|
|
153,115 |
|
|
|
296,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities, preferred members interest and members equity |
|
$ |
2,349,214 |
|
|
$ |
2,444,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to the unaudited financial statements are an integral part of these statements
4
MEDIACOM BROADBAND LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(All amounts in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
207,309 |
|
|
$ |
195,627 |
|
|
$ |
416,789 |
|
|
$ |
386,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service costs (exclusive of depreciation
and amortization) |
|
|
84,469 |
|
|
|
78,161 |
|
|
|
170,187 |
|
|
|
155,202 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
40,446 |
|
|
|
40,979 |
|
|
|
80,754 |
|
|
|
81,355 |
|
Management fee expense |
|
|
3,954 |
|
|
|
3,700 |
|
|
|
7,850 |
|
|
|
7,451 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
28,488 |
|
|
|
30,172 |
|
|
|
56,985 |
|
|
|
59,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
49,952 |
|
|
|
42,615 |
|
|
|
101,013 |
|
|
|
82,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(28,099 |
) |
|
|
(28,666 |
) |
|
|
(55,047 |
) |
|
|
(56,564 |
) |
Gain (loss) on derivatives, net |
|
|
14,339 |
|
|
|
14,399 |
|
|
|
13,187 |
|
|
|
(777 |
) |
Other expense, net |
|
|
(1,316 |
) |
|
|
(832 |
) |
|
|
(2,824 |
) |
|
|
(1,691 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
34,876 |
|
|
$ |
27,516 |
|
|
$ |
56,329 |
|
|
$ |
23,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend to preferred member |
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to member |
|
$ |
30,376 |
|
|
$ |
23,016 |
|
|
$ |
47,329 |
|
|
$ |
14,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to the unaudited financial statements are an integral part of these statements
5
MEDIACOM BROADBAND LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(All dollar amounts in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
56,329 |
|
|
$ |
23,666 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
56,985 |
|
|
|
59,660 |
|
(Gain) loss on derivatives, net |
|
|
(13,187 |
) |
|
|
777 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
1,869 |
|
|
|
1,551 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
(2,646 |
) |
|
|
2,561 |
|
Accounts receivable affiliates |
|
|
(9,434 |
) |
|
|
(16,716 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
(4,017 |
) |
|
|
754 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
(4,312 |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
1,033 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
(868 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
88,626 |
|
|
$ |
68,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
(55,672 |
) |
|
$ |
(69,976 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows used in investing activities |
|
$ |
(55,672 |
) |
|
$ |
(69,976 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New borrowings |
|
$ |
277,000 |
|
|
$ |
490,000 |
|
Repayment of debt |
|
|
(217,000 |
) |
|
|
(425,033 |
) |
Capital distributions to parent (Notes 2, 9) |
|
|
(83,854 |
) |
|
|
(34,000 |
) |
Capital contributions from parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
Dividend payment on preferred members interest |
|
|
(9,000 |
) |
|
|
(9,000 |
) |
Dividend payment to parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,389 |
) |
Financing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,446 |
) |
Other Financing activites book overdrafts |
|
|
(1,514 |
) |
|
|
1,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
$ |
(34,368 |
) |
|
$ |
19,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash |
|
|
(1,414 |
) |
|
|
17,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH, beginning of period |
|
|
15,502 |
|
|
|
9,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH, end of period |
|
$ |
14,088 |
|
|
$ |
26,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for interest, net of amounts capitalized |
|
$ |
55,362 |
|
|
$ |
54,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS FINANCING: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange of cable systems with related party |
|
$ |
108,643 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to the unaudited financial statements are an integral part of these statements
6
MEDIACOM BROADBAND LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ORGANIZATION
Basis of Preparation of Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Mediacom Broadband LLC (Mediacom Broadband, and collectively with its subsidiaries, we, our
or us), a Delaware limited liability company wholly-owned by Mediacom Communications Corporation
(MCC), is involved in the acquisition and operation of cable systems serving smaller cities and
towns in the United States.
We have prepared these unaudited consolidated financial statements in accordance with the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). In the opinion of management,
such statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals and adjustments,
necessary for a fair presentation of our consolidated results of operations and financial position
for the interim periods presented. The accounting policies followed during such interim periods
reported are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of
America and are consistent with those applied during annual periods. For a summary of our
accounting policies and other information, refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily
indicative of the results that might be expected for future interim periods or for the full year
ending December 31, 2009.
Mediacom Broadband Corporation (Broadband Corporation), a Delaware corporation wholly-owned by
us, co-issued, jointly and severally with us, public debt securities. Broadband Corporation has no
operations, revenues or cash flows and has no assets, liabilities or stockholders equity on its
balance sheet, other than a one-hundred dollar receivable from an affiliate and the same dollar
amount of common stock. Therefore, separate financial statements have not been presented for this
entity.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year amounts to conform to the current years
presentation.
2. RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157 establishes a single authoritative definition of fair value, sets
out a framework for measuring fair value and expands on required disclosures about fair value
measurement. On January 1, 2009, we completed our adoption of SFAS No. 157 which did not have a
material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level
of Activity for the Asset or the Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying
Transactions That Are Not Orderly. FSP No. FAS 157-4 amends Statement No. 157 to provide
additional guidance on (i) estimating fair value when the volume and level of activity for an asset
or liability have significantly decreased in relation to normal market activity for the asset or
liability, and (ii) circumstances that may indicate that a transaction is not orderly. FSP No. FAS
157-4 also requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements in interim and annual
reporting periods. FSP No. FAS 157-4 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending
after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied prospectively. We have completed our evaluation of FSP
No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 and determined that the adoption did not have a material effect on our
consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
The following sets forth our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis at June 30, 2009. These assets and liabilities have been categorized according to the
three-level fair value hierarchy established by SFAS No. 157, which prioritizes the inputs used in
measuring fair value.
|
|
Level 1 Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
|
|
Level 2 Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by
market data. |
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data. |
7
As of June 30, 2009, our interest rate exchange agreement liabilities, net, were valued
at $34.2 million using Level 2 inputs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value as of June 30, 2009 |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate exchange agreements |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,704 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate exchange agreements |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
35,893 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
35,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate exchange agreements liabilities, net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
34,189 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
34,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008, our interest rate exchange agreement liabilities, net, were
valued at $47.4 million using Level 2 inputs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value as of December 31, 2008 |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate exchange agreements |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate exchange agreements |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
47,376 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
47,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate exchange agreements liabilities, net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
47,376 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
47,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS No. 159 permits
entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. We
adopted SFAS No. 159 as of January 1, 2008. We did not elect the fair value option of SFAS No. 159.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (R), Business Combinations, which continues to
require the treatment that all business combinations be accounted for by applying the acquisition
method. Under the acquisition method, the acquirer recognizes and measures the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any contingent consideration and contractual contingencies,
as a whole, at their fair value as of the acquisition date. Under SFAS No. 141 (R), all transaction
costs are expensed as incurred. SFAS No. 141 (R) replaces SFAS No. 141. The guidance in SFAS No.
141 (R) will be applied prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on
or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2008. We
adopted SFAS No. 141 (R) on January 1, 2009 and determined that the adoption did not have a
material effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced disclosures
about an entitys derivative and hedging activities and thereby improves the transparency of
financial reporting. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and
interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. We have
completed our evaluation of SFAS No. 161 and determined that the adoption did not have a material
effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events. SFAS No. 165 establishes
general standards for the accounting and disclosure of events that occurred after the balance sheet
date but before the financial statements are issued. SFAS No. 165 is effective for interim or
annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. We have completed our evaluation of SFAS No. 165 as of
June 30, 2009 and determined that the adoption did not have a material effect on our consolidated
financial condition or results of operations. See Note 11 for the disclosures required by SFAS
No. 165.
8
In April 2009, the FASB staff issued FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures
about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1). This FSP amends FASB
Statement No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to require disclosures
about fair value of financial instruments in interim financial statements as well as in annual
financial statements. This FSP also amends Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 28, Interim
Financial Reporting, to require these disclosures in all interim financial statements. FSP No. FAS
107-1 and APB 28-1 are effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. We have
completed our evaluation of FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 and determined that the adoption did not
have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations. See Note
5 for more information.
3. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cable systems, equipment and subscriber devices |
|
$ |
1,428,756 |
|
|
$ |
1,367,623 |
|
Vehicles |
|
|
38,148 |
|
|
|
37,755 |
|
Buildings and leasehold improvements |
|
|
26,634 |
|
|
|
25,692 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and office equipment |
|
|
20,058 |
|
|
|
18,989 |
|
Land and land improvements |
|
|
4,949 |
|
|
|
4,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,518,545 |
|
|
$ |
1,455,049 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(784,203 |
) |
|
|
(705,983 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
$ |
734,342 |
|
|
$ |
749,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Estimate Useful lives
Effective July 1, 2008, we changed the estimated useful lives of certain plant and equipment within
our cable systems in connection with our deployment of all digital video technology both in the
network and at the customers home. These changes in asset lives were based on our plans and our
experience thus far in executing such plans, to deploy all digital video technology across all of
our cable systems. This technology affords us the opportunity to increase network capacity without
costly upgrades and, as such, extends the useful lives of cable plant by four years. We have also
begun to provide all digital set-top boxes to our customer base as part of this all digital network
deployment. In connection with the all digital set-top launch, we have reviewed the asset lives of
our customer premise equipment and determined that their useful lives should be extended by two
years. While the timing and extent of current deployment plans are subject to modification,
management believes that extending the useful lives is appropriate and will be subject to ongoing
analysis. The weighted average useful lives of such fixed assets changed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful lives (in years) |
|
|
|
From |
|
|
To |
|
Plant and equipment |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer premise equipment |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
These changes were made on a prospective basis effective July 1, 2008, and resulted in a reduction
of depreciation expense and a corresponding increase in net income of approximately $3.2 million
and $6.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.
9
4. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities consisted of the following
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Liability under interest rate exchange agreements |
|
$ |
26,251 |
|
|
$ |
26,689 |
|
Accrued programming costs |
|
|
20,151 |
|
|
|
20,673 |
|
Intercompany accounts payable and other accrued expenses |
|
|
19,344 |
|
|
|
23,257 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
16,617 |
|
|
|
16,887 |
|
Accrued taxes and fees |
|
|
16,327 |
|
|
|
17,914 |
|
Accrued payroll and benefits |
|
|
14,638 |
|
|
|
14,083 |
|
Book overdrafts (1) |
|
|
6,963 |
|
|
|
8,387 |
|
Accrued service costs |
|
|
6,654 |
|
|
|
5,896 |
|
Advance subscriber payments |
|
|
5,851 |
|
|
|
5,954 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
5,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued property, plant and equipment |
|
|
5,081 |
|
|
|
5,395 |
|
Accrued telecommunications costs |
|
|
2,598 |
|
|
|
2,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
$ |
146,299 |
|
|
$ |
147,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Book overdrafts represent outstanding checks in excess of funds on deposit at our
disbursement accounts. We transfer funds from our depository accounts to our disbursement
accounts upon daily notification of checks presented for payment. Changes in book
overdrafts are reported as part of cash flows from financing activities in our
consolidated statement of cash flows. |
5. DEBT
Debt consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Bank credit
facility |
|
$ |
1,356,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,296,000 |
|
81/2% senior notes due 2015 |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,856,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,796,000 |
|
Less: current portion |
|
|
76,750 |
|
|
|
94,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,779,250 |
|
|
$ |
1,702,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank Credit Facility
The average interest rates on outstanding debt under our bank credit facility (the credit
facility) as of June 30, 2009 and 2008 were 5.8% and 6.0%, respectively, including the effect of
the interest rate exchange agreements discussed below.
As of June 30, 2009, we had unused revolving credit commitments of $309.5 million under our credit
facility, all of which could be borrowed and used for general corporate purposes based on the terms
and conditions of our debt arrangements. As of the same date, $52.9 million of our unused revolving
credit commitments were subject to scheduled quarterly reductions terminating on March 31, 2010;
$256.6 million of our unused revolving credit commitments expire on December 31, 2012, and are not
subject to scheduled reductions prior to maturity. Continued access to our credit facility is
subject to our remaining in compliance with the covenants of such credit facility, principally the
requirement that we maintain a maximum ratio of total senior debt to cash flow, as defined in the
credit agreement, of 6.0 to 1.0.
As of June 30, 2009, approximately $9.5 million of letters of credit were issued under our credit
facility to various parties as collateral for our performance relating to insurance and franchise
requirements.
10
Senior Notes
We have issued senior notes totaling $500 million as of June 30, 2009. The indentures governing our
senior notes contain financial and other covenants that are generally less restrictive than those
found in our credit facility, and do not require us to maintain any financial ratios. Principal
covenants include a limitation on the incurrence of additional indebtedness based upon a maximum
ratio of total indebtedness to cash flow, as defined in these agreements, of 8.5 to 1.0. These
agreements also contain limitations on dividends, investments and distributions.
Covenant Compliance and Debt Ratings
For all periods through June 30, 2009, we were in compliance with all of the covenants under our
credit facility and senior note arrangements. There are no covenants, events of default, borrowing
conditions or other terms in our credit facility or senior note arrangements that are based on
changes in our credit rating assigned by any rating agency.
Fair Value
As of June 30, 2009, the fair values of our senior notes and credit facility are as follows
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
8 1/2% senior notes due 2015 |
|
$ |
449,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit facility |
|
$ |
1,302,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps
We use interest rate exchange agreements, or interest rate swaps, in order to fix the rate of the
applicable Eurodollar portion of debt under our credit facility to reduce the potential volatility
in our interest expense that would otherwise result from changes in market interest rates. Our
interest rate swaps have not been designated as hedges for accounting purposes, and have been
accounted for on a mark-to-market basis as of, and for, the three and six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008.
As of June 30, 2009, we had current interest rate swaps with various banks pursuant to which the
interest rate on $900 million was fixed at a weighted average rate of 4.7%. As of the same date,
about 75% of our total outstanding indebtedness was at fixed rates, or subject to interest rate
protection. Our current interest rate swaps are scheduled to expire in the amounts of $500 million,
$100 million, $100 million and $200 million during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010, 2011
and 2012, respectively.
We have entered into forward-starting interest rate swaps that will fix rates for a two year period
at a rate of 3.3% on $100 million of floating rate debt, which will commence during the balance of
2009, and 2.9% on $100 million of floating rate debt, which will commence during 2010. We also
entered into forward-starting interest rate swaps that will fix rates for a three year period at a
weighted average rate of 3.0% on $300 million of floating rate debt, which will commence during the
balance of 2009.
The fair value of our interest rate swaps is the estimated amount that we would receive or pay to
terminate such agreements, taking into account market interest rates and the remaining time to
maturities. As of June 30, 2009, based upon mark-to-market valuation, we recorded on our
consolidated balance sheet, a long-term asset of $1.7 million, an accumulated current liability of
$26.3 million and an accumulated long-term liability of $9.6 million. As of December 31, 2008,
based upon mark-to-market valuation, we recorded on our consolidated balance sheet an accumulated
current liability of $26.7 million and an accumulated long-term liability of $20.7 million.
As a result of the mark-to-market valuations on these interest rate swaps, we recorded a net gain
on derivatives of $14.3 million and $14.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively, and a net gain on derivatives of $13.2 million and a net loss on derivatives of
$0.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
6. PREFERRED MEMBERS INTERESTS
Mediacom LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of MCC, has a $150.0 million preferred equity investment in
our company as of June 30, 2009. The preferred equity investment has a 12% annual dividend, payable
quarterly in cash. During each of the three months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, we paid $4.5 million in cash dividends on the preferred equity. During
each of the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, we paid $9.0 million in cash dividends on the
preferred equity.
11
7. MEMBERS EQUITY
Share-based Compensation
Total share-based compensation expense was as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Share-based compensation expense by type of award: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options |
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
Employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Restricted stock units |
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation expense |
|
$ |
310 |
|
|
$ |
228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended June 30, 2009, there were no restricted stock units or stock options
granted to our employees under MCCs compensation programs. Each of the restricted stock units and
stock options in MCCs stock compensation programs are exchangeable and exercisable, respectively,
into a share of MCCs Class A common stock. During the three months ended June 30, 2009, no
restricted stock units were vested and no stock options were exercised.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Share-based compensation expense by type of award: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options |
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
Employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
Restricted stock units |
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation expense |
|
$ |
590 |
|
|
$ |
351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, 170,000 restricted stock units and 57,000 stock options
were granted to our employees under MCCs compensation programs. Each of the restricted stock
units and stock options in MCCs stock compensation programs are exchangeable and exercisable,
respectively, into a share of MCCs Class A common stock. The weighted average fair values
associated with these grants were $4.73 per restricted stock unit and $3.95 per stock option.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, approximately 76,000 restricted stock units were vested
and no stock options were exercised.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Under MCCs employee stock purchase program, all of our employees are allowed to participate in the
purchase of shares of MCCs Class A common stock at a 15% discount on the date of the allocation.
Shares purchased by our employees under MCCs plan amounted to approximately 103,000 and 93,000 for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The net proceeds to MCC were
approximately $0.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. The net proceeds to
MCC were approximately $0.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008.
12
8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Legal Proceedings
We,
our parent company and our subsidiaries or other affiliated companies
are involved in various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion
of management, the ultimate disposition of these other matters will not have a material adverse
effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, cash flows or business.
9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION
Share Exchange Agreement between MCC and an affiliate of Morris Communications
On September 7, 2008, MCC entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the Exchange Agreement) with
Shivers Investments, LLC (Shivers) and Shivers Trading & Operating Company (STOC). Both STOC
and Shivers are affiliates of Morris Communications Company, LLC (Morris Communications).
On February 13, 2009, MCC completed the Exchange Agreement pursuant to which it exchanged 100% of
the shares of stock of a wholly-owned subsidiary, which held approximately $110 million of cash and
non-strategic cable systems serving approximately 25,000 basic subscribers contributed to MCC by
Mediacom LLC, for 28,309,674 shares of MCC Class A common stock held by Shivers.
Asset Transfer Agreement with MCC and Mediacom LLC
On February 11, 2009, our operating subsidiaries executed an Asset Transfer Agreement (the
Transfer Agreement) with MCC and certain of the operating subsidiaries of Mediacom LLC, pursuant
to which certain of our cable systems located in Illinois, which serve approximately 42,200 basic
subscribers, and a cash payment of $8.2 million would be exchanged for certain of Mediacom LLCs
cable systems located in Florida, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, and Wisconsin, which serve
approximately 45,900 basic subscribers (the Asset Transfer). We believe the Asset Transfer will
better align our customer base geographically, making our cable systems more clustered and allowing
for more effective management, administration, controls and reporting of our field operations. The
Asset Transfer was completed on February 13, 2009 (the transfer date).
As part of the Transfer Agreement, Mediacom LLC contributed to MCC cable systems located in Western
North Carolina, which serve approximately 25,000 basic subscribers. These cable systems were part
of the Exchange Agreement noted above. In connection therewith, Mediacom LLC received on February
12, 2009 a $74 million cash contribution from MCC that had been contributed to MCC by us on the
same date. On February 12, 2009, our operating subsidiaries borrowed $74 million under the
revolving commitments of their bank credit facility to fund this contribution to MCC.
The net assets of the cable systems we received as part of the Asset Transfer were accounted for as
a transfer of businesses under common control in accordance with SFAS No. 141(R). Under this method
of accounting: (i) the net assets we received have been recorded at Mediacom LLCs carrying
amounts; (ii) the net assets of the cable systems we transferred to Mediacom LLC and MCC were
removed from our consolidated balance sheet at net book value on the transfer date; (iii) for the
cable systems we received, we recorded their results of operations as if the transfer date was
January 1, 2009; and (iv) for the cable systems we transferred to Mediacom LLC and MCC, we ceased
recording those results of operations as of the transfer date. See Note 2.
We recognized an additional $5.3 million in revenues and $1.7 million of net income, for the period
January 1, 2009 through the transfer date, because we recorded the results of operations for the
cable systems we received as part of the Asset Transfer, as if the transfer date was January 1,
2009. This $1.7 million of cash flows was recorded under the caption capital distributions to
parent on our consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
The financial statements for the periods prior to January 1, 2009 were not adjusted for the receipt
of net assets because the net assets did not meet the definition of a business under generally
accepted accounting principles in effect prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 141(R).
13
10. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, the amortization of
goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets is prohibited and requires such assets to be tested
annually for impairment, or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. We have determined that
our cable franchise rights and goodwill are indefinite-lived assets and therefore not amortizable.
We directly assess the value of cable franchise rights for impairment under SFAS No. 142 by
utilizing a discounted cash flow methodology. In performing an impairment test in accordance with
SFAS No. 142, we make assumptions, such as future cash flow expectations and other future benefits
related to cable franchise rights, which are consistent with the expectations of buyers and sellers
of cable systems in determining fair value. If the determined fair value of our cable franchise
rights is less than the carrying amount on the financial statements, an impairment charge would be
recognized for the difference between the fair value and the carrying value of such assets.
Goodwill impairment is determined using a two-step process. The first step compares the fair value
of a reporting unit with our carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting
unit exceeds our carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired and the
second step is unnecessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds our fair value, the
second step is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step compares
the implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill, calculated using the residual method, with
the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds the implied
fair value, the excess is recognized as an impairment loss. We conducted our annual impairment test
as of October 1, 2008.
The economic conditions currently affecting the U.S. economy and how that may impact the long-term
fundamentals of our business may have a negative impact on the fair values of the assets in our
reporting units. This may result in the recognition of an impairment loss when we perform our next
annual impairment testing during the fourth quarter of 2009.
Because there has not been a meaningful change in the long-term fundamentals of our business during
the first half of 2009, we have determined that there has been no triggering event under SFAS No.
142, and as such, no interim impairment test is required as of June 30, 2009.
11. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
We have evaluated the impact of subsequent events on our consolidated financials statements and
related footnotes through the date of issuance, August 7, 2009.
14
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial
statements as of, and for, the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, and with our annual report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. Certain items have been reclassified to conform
to the current years presentation.
Overview
We are a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mediacom Communications Corporation (MCC), the nations
eighth largest cable television company based on the number of basic video subscribers, or basic
subscribers, and among the leading cable operators focused on serving the smaller cities and towns
in the United States. Through our interactive broadband network, we provide our customers with a
wide array of advanced products and services, including video services such as video-on-demand,
high-definition television (HDTV) and digital video recorders (DVRs), in addition to high-speed
data (HSD) and phone service. We offer triple-play bundles of video, HSD and phone to
approximately 93% of our estimated homes passed. Bundled products and services offer our customers
a single provider contact for ordering, provisioning, billing and customer care.
As of June 30, 2009, our cable systems passed an estimated 1.51 million homes and served 715,000
basic subscribers in seven states. As of the same date, we served 366,000 digital video customers,
or digital customers, representing a penetration of 51.2% of our basic subscribers; 415,000 HSD
customers, representing a penetration of 27.5% of our estimated homes passed; and 143,000 phone
customers, representing a penetration of 10.2% of our estimated marketable phone homes.
15
We evaluate our performance, in part, by measuring the number of revenue generating units (RGUs)
we serve, which represent the total of basic subscribers and digital, HSD and phone customers. As
of June 30, 2009, we served 1.64 million RGUs.
Recent Developments
Share Exchange Agreement between MCC and an affiliate of Morris Communications
On September 7, 2008, MCC entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the Exchange Agreement) with
Shivers Investments, LLC (Shivers) and Shivers Trading & Operating Company (STOC). Both STOC
and Shivers are affiliates of Morris Communications Company, LLC (Morris Communications).
On February 13, 2009, MCC completed the Exchange Agreement pursuant to which it exchanged 100% of
the shares of stock of a wholly-owned subsidiary, which held approximately $110 million of cash and
non-strategic cable systems serving approximately 25,000 basic subscribers contributed to MCC by
Mediacom LLC, for 28,309,674 shares of MCC Class A common stock held by Shivers.
Asset Transfer Agreement with MCC and Mediacom LLC
On February 11, 2009, our operating subsidiaries executed an Asset Transfer Agreement (the
Transfer Agreement) with MCC and certain of the operating subsidiaries of Mediacom LLC, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of MCC, pursuant to which certain of our cable systems located in Illinois
and a cash payment of $8.2 million would be exchanged for certain of Mediacom LLCs cable systems
located in Florida, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, and Wisconsin (the Asset Transfer). The
net effect of the Asset Transfer on our subscriber and customer base was the gain of 3,700 basic
subscribers and the loss of 1,000 digital customers, 1,000 HSD customers and 600 phone customers.
We believe the Asset Transfer will better align our customer base geographically, making our cable
systems more clustered and allowing for more effective management, administration, controls and
reporting of our field operations. The Asset Transfer was completed on February 13, 2009 (the
transfer date).
As part of the Transfer Agreement, Mediacom LLC contributed to MCC cable systems located in Western
North Carolina, which served approximately 25,000 basic subscribers. These cable systems were part
of the Exchange Agreement noted above. In connection therewith, Mediacom LLC received on February
12, 2009 a $74 million cash contribution from MCC that had been contributed to MCC by us on the
same date. On February 12, 2009, our operating subsidiaries borrowed $74 million under the
revolving commitments of their bank credit facility to fund this contribution to MCC.
Revenues, Costs and Expenses
Video revenues primarily represent monthly subscription fees charged to customers for our core
cable products and services (including basic and digital cable programming services, wire
maintenance, equipment rental and services to commercial establishments), pay-per-view charges,
installation, reconnection and late payment fees and other ancillary revenues. HSD revenues
primarily represent monthly fees charged to customers, including small to medium sized commercial
establishments, for our HSD products and services and equipment rental fees, as well as fees
charged to medium to large sized businesses for our scalable, fiber- based enterprise network
products and services. Phone revenues primarily represent monthly fees charged to customers.
Advertising revenues represent the sale of advertising time on various channels.
Significant service costs include: programming expenses; employee expenses related to wages and
salaries of technical personnel who maintain our cable network, perform customer installation
activities and provide customer support; HSD costs, including costs of bandwidth connectivity and
customer provisioning; phone service costs, including delivery and other expenses; and field
operating costs, including outside contractors, vehicle, utilities and pole rental expenses.
Video programming costs, which are generally paid on a per subscriber basis, represent our largest
single expense and have historically increased due to both increases in the rates charged for
existing programming services and the introduction of new programming services to our customers.
These costs are expected to continue to grow principally because of contractual unit rate increases
and the increasing demands of television broadcast station owners for retransmission consent fees.
As a consequence, it is expected that our video gross margins will decline as increases in
programming costs outpace growth in video revenues.
16
Significant selling, general and administrative expenses include: wages and salaries for our call
centers, customer service and support and administrative personnel; franchise fees and taxes;
marketing; bad debt; billing; advertising; and office costs related to telecommunications and
office administration.
Management fee expense reflects charges incurred under management
arrangements with our parent, MCC.
Adjusted OIBDA
We define Adjusted OIBDA as operating income before depreciation and amortization and non-cash,
share-based compensation charges. Adjusted OIBDA is one of the primary measures used by management
to evaluate our performance and to forecast future results but is not a financial measure
calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States.
It is also a significant performance measure in our annual incentive compensation programs. We
believe Adjusted OIBDA is useful for investors because it enables them to assess our performance in
a manner similar to the methods used by management, and provides a measure that can be used to
analyze, value and compare the companies in the cable industry, which may have different
depreciation and amortization policies, as well as different non-cash, share-based compensation
programs. Adjusted OIBDA and similar measures are used in calculating compliance with the covenants
of our debt arrangements. A limitation of Adjusted OIBDA, however, is that it excludes depreciation
and amortization, which represents the periodic costs of certain capitalized tangible and
intangible assets used in generating revenues in our business. Management utilizes a separate
process to budget, measure and evaluate capital expenditures. In addition, Adjusted OIBDA has the
limitation of not reflecting the effect of the non-cash, share-based compensation charges.
Adjusted OIBDA should not be regarded as an alternative to either operating income or net income
(loss) as an indicator of operating performance nor should it be considered in isolation or as a
substitute for financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. We believe that operating
income is the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to Adjusted OIBDA.
17
Actual Results of Operations
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
The following tables set forth the consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 (dollars in thousands and percentage changes that are not meaningful are
marked NM):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
207,309 |
|
|
$ |
195,627 |
|
|
$ |
11,682 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service costs (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) |
|
|
84,469 |
|
|
|
78,161 |
|
|
|
6,308 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
40,446 |
|
|
|
40,979 |
|
|
|
(533 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
%) |
Management fee expense |
|
|
3,954 |
|
|
|
3,700 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
28,488 |
|
|
|
30,172 |
|
|
|
(1,684 |
) |
|
|
(5.6 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
49,952 |
|
|
|
42,615 |
|
|
|
7,337 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(28,099 |
) |
|
|
(28,666 |
) |
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
%) |
Gain on derivatives, net |
|
|
14,339 |
|
|
|
14,399 |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
%) |
Other expense, net |
|
|
(1,316 |
) |
|
|
(832 |
) |
|
|
(484 |
) |
|
|
58.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
34,876 |
|
|
$ |
27,516 |
|
|
$ |
7,360 |
|
|
|
26.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted OIBDA |
|
$ |
78,750 |
|
|
$ |
73,015 |
|
|
$ |
5,735 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following represents a reconciliation of Adjusted OIBDA to operating income, which is the most
directly comparable GAAP measure (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted OIBDA |
|
$ |
78,750 |
|
|
$ |
73,015 |
|
|
$ |
5,735 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
% |
Non-cash, share-based compensation |
|
|
(310 |
) |
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
36.0 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(28,488 |
) |
|
|
(30,172 |
) |
|
|
1,684 |
|
|
|
(5.6 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
49,952 |
|
|
$ |
42,615 |
|
|
$ |
7,337 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
Revenues
The following tables set forth the revenues, and selected subscriber, customer and average monthly
revenue statistics for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (dollars in thousands, except
per subscriber data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Video |
|
$ |
132,901 |
|
|
$ |
128,332 |
|
|
$ |
4,569 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
HSD |
|
|
48,698 |
|
|
|
43,787 |
|
|
|
4,911 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
% |
Phone |
|
|
15,076 |
|
|
|
12,357 |
|
|
|
2,719 |
|
|
|
22.0 |
% |
Advertising |
|
|
10,634 |
|
|
|
11,151 |
|
|
|
(517 |
) |
|
|
(4.6 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
207,309 |
|
|
$ |
195,627 |
|
|
$ |
11,682 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Increase/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
% Change |
|
Basic subscribers |
|
|
715,000 |
|
|
|
715,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM |
|
Digital customers |
|
|
366,000 |
|
|
|
335,000 |
|
|
|
31,000 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
% |
HSD customers |
|
|
415,000 |
|
|
|
379,000 |
|
|
|
36,000 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
% |
Phone customers |
|
|
143,000 |
|
|
|
122,000 |
|
|
|
21,000 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RGUs(1) |
|
|
1,639,000 |
|
|
|
1,551,000 |
|
|
|
88,000 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average total monthly revenue per basic subscriber (2) |
|
$ |
96.04 |
|
|
$ |
90.76 |
|
|
$ |
5.28 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
RGUs represent the total of basic subscribers and digital, HSD and phone customers. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents total average monthly revenues for the quarter divided by total average basic
subscribers for such period. |
Revenues increased $11.7 million, or 6.0%, largely attributable to growth in our HSD, digital and,
to a lesser extent, phone customers. RGUs grew 5.7%, and average total monthly revenue per basic
subscriber increased $5.28, or 5.8%.
Video revenues grew $4.6 million, or 3.6%, primarily due to digital customer growth and, to a
lesser extent, higher fees from our other advanced video products and services. During the three
months ended June 30, 2009, we lost 9,000 basic subscribers, compared to a loss of 7,000 basic
subscribers for the same period last year, and we gained 4,000 digital customers in each of the
current and prior year period. As of June 30, 2009, 37.1% of our digital customers were taking our
DVR and/or HDTV services, as compared to 32.8% as of the same date last year.
HSD revenues rose $4.9 million, or 11.2%, principally due to a 9.5% increase in HSD customers and,
to a lesser extent, higher unit pricing. During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we gained
2,000 HSD customers, as compared to a gain of 5,000 in the prior year period.
Phone revenues grew $2.7 million, or 22.0%, mainly due to a 17.2% increase in phone customers and,
to a lesser extent, higher unit pricing. During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we gained
3,000 phone customers, as compared to a gain of 8,000 in the prior year period. As of June 30,
2009, our phone service was marketed to approximately 93% of our estimated 1.51 million homes
passed.
Advertising revenues decreased $0.5 million, or 4.6%, largely as a result of lower local
advertising sales, particularly in the automotive segment, offset in part by higher national
advertising sales.
Costs and Expenses
Service costs rose $6.3 million, or 8.1%, primarily due to higher programming, and, to a much
lesser extent, phone service costs. Programming expenses increased 10.3%, largely as a result of
higher contractual rates charged by our programming vendors and, to a lesser extent, greater
retransmission consent fees and the recent launch of new sports programming. Phone service costs
rose 8.2% principally due to the increase in phone customers. Service costs as a percentage of revenues were
40.7% and 40.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
19
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $0.5 million, or 1.3%, largely as a result
of lower customer service employee and, to a lesser extent, telecommunications costs, mostly offset
by higher billing expenses and taxes and fees. Customer service employee costs fell 9.1%, largely
due to a reduction in call center outsourcing. Telecommunications costs dropped 16.3%,
principally due to more efficient call routing and internal network use. Billing expenses rose
7.9%, primarily due to higher processing fees. Taxes and fees increased 3.0% as a result of higher
property taxes in certain of our service areas. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a
percentage of revenues were 19.5% and 20.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Management fee expense increased $0.3 million, or 6.9%, reflecting higher overhead charges at MCC.
Management fee expenses as a percentage of revenues were 1.9% for each of the three months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008.
Depreciation and amortization decreased $1.7 million, or 5.6%, largely as a result of an increase
in the useful lives of certain fixed assets, offset in part by greater deployment of shorter-lived
customer premise equipment.
Adjusted OIBDA
Adjusted OIBDA increased $5.7 million, or 7.9%, mainly due to growth in HSD, video and, to a lesser
extent, phone revenues, offset in part by higher service costs.
Operating Income
Operating income increased $7.3 million, or 17.2%, principally due to the increase in Adjusted
OIBDA and, to a much lesser extent, lower depreciation and amortization, offset in part by higher
service costs.
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net, decreased 2.0%, primarily due to lower market interest rates on variable
rate debt, offset in part by higher average indebtedness as a result of our $74 million
contribution to MCC under the Transfer Agreement.
Gain on Derivatives, Net
As of June 30, 2009, we had interest rate exchange agreements, or interest rate swaps, with an
aggregate notional amount of $1.4 billion, of which $500 million are forward-starting interest rate
swaps. These swaps have not been designated as hedges for accounting purposes. The changes in their
mark-to-market values are derived primarily from changes in market interest rates and the decrease
in their time to maturity. As a result of the quarterly mark-to-market valuation of these interest
rate swaps, we recorded a net gain on derivatives of $14.3 million and $14.4 million, based upon
information provided by our counterparties, for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Other Expense, Net
Other expense, net was $1.3 million and $0.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively. During the three months ended June 30, 2009, other expense, net, included $0.8
million of deferred financing costs and $0.5 million for revolving credit facility commitment fees.
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, other expense, net, included $0.4 million of revolving
credit facility commitment fees and $0.4 million of deferred financing costs.
Net Income
As a result of the factors described above, we recognized net income of $34.9 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2009, compared to net income of $27.5 million for the prior year period.
20
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 compared to Six months Ended June 30, 2008
The following tables set forth the consolidated statements of operations for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 (dollars in thousands and percentage changes that are not meaningful are
marked NM):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
416,789 |
|
|
$ |
386,366 |
|
|
$ |
30,423 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
% |
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service costs (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) |
|
|
170,187 |
|
|
|
155,202 |
|
|
|
14,985 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
80,754 |
|
|
|
81,355 |
|
|
|
(601 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
%) |
Management fee expense |
|
|
7,850 |
|
|
|
7,451 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
56,985 |
|
|
|
59,660 |
|
|
|
(2,675 |
) |
|
|
(4.5 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
101,013 |
|
|
|
82,698 |
|
|
|
18,315 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(55,047 |
) |
|
|
(56,564 |
) |
|
|
1,517 |
|
|
|
(2.7 |
%) |
Gain (loss) on derivatives, net |
|
|
13,187 |
|
|
|
(777 |
) |
|
|
13,964 |
|
|
NM |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
(2,824 |
) |
|
|
(1,691 |
) |
|
|
(1,133 |
) |
|
|
67.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
56,329 |
|
|
$ |
23,666 |
|
|
$ |
32,663 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted OIBDA |
|
$ |
158,588 |
|
|
$ |
142,709 |
|
|
$ |
15,879 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following represents a reconciliation of Adjusted OIBDA to operating income, which is the most
directly comparable GAAP measure (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted OIBDA |
|
$ |
158,588 |
|
|
$ |
142,709 |
|
|
$ |
15,879 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
% |
Non-cash, share-based compensation |
|
|
(590 |
) |
|
|
(351 |
) |
|
|
(239 |
) |
|
|
68.1 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(56,985 |
) |
|
|
(59,660 |
) |
|
|
2,675 |
|
|
|
(4.5 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
101,013 |
|
|
$ |
82,698 |
|
|
$ |
18,315 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
The following tables set forth the revenues, and selected subscriber, customer and average monthly
revenue statistics for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (dollars in thousands, except
per subscriber data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Video |
|
$ |
269,334 |
|
|
$ |
255,609 |
|
|
$ |
13,725 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
% |
HSD |
|
|
97,924 |
|
|
|
85,982 |
|
|
|
11,942 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
% |
Phone |
|
|
29,752 |
|
|
|
23,468 |
|
|
|
6,284 |
|
|
|
26.8 |
% |
Advertising |
|
|
19,779 |
|
|
|
21,307 |
|
|
|
(1,528 |
) |
|
|
(7.2 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
416,789 |
|
|
$ |
386,366 |
|
|
$ |
30,423 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Increase/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
% Change |
|
Basic subscribers |
|
|
715,000 |
|
|
|
715,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Digital customers |
|
|
366,000 |
|
|
|
335,000 |
|
|
|
31,000 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
% |
HSD customers |
|
|
415,000 |
|
|
|
379,000 |
|
|
|
36,000 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
% |
Phone customers |
|
|
143,000 |
|
|
|
122,000 |
|
|
|
21,000 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RGUs |
|
|
1,639,000 |
|
|
|
1,551,000 |
|
|
|
88,000 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average total monthly revenue per basic subscriber |
|
$ |
97.02 |
|
|
$ |
89.75 |
|
|
$ |
7.27 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
% |
Revenues rose $30.4 million, or 7.9%, of which $25.1 million was largely attributable to growth in
our digital, HSD and, to a lesser extent, phone customers. The remaining increase of $5.3 million
was related to the accounting treatment of the Asset Transfer, as described above in Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements Business Combinations. Average total monthly revenue per basic
subscriber increased $7.27, or 8.1%, compared to the prior year period, of which $1.24 was related
to the Asset Transfer.
Video revenues grew $13.7 million, or 5.4%, of which $10.0 million was primarily due to digital
customer growth and, to a lesser extent, higher fees from our other advanced products and services
and basic video rate increases, with the remaining $3.7 million related to the Asset Transfer.
Excluding the effect of the Transfer Agreement, during the six months ended June 30, 2009, we lost
5.700 basic subscribers, as compared to a loss of 5,000 basic subscribers in the prior year period,
and we gained 12,000 digital customers, as compared to an increase of 18,000 in the prior year
period.
HSD revenues grew $11.9 million, or 13.9%, of which $10.7 million was primarily due to a 9.5%
increase in HSD customers and, to a lesser extent, growth higher unit pricing, with the remaining
$1.2 million related to the Asset Transfer. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we gained
16,000 HSD customers, excluding the effect of the Transfer Agreement, as compared to a gain of
20,000 in the prior year period.
Phone revenues grew $6.3 million, or 26.8%, of which $5.9 million was mainly due to a 17.2%
increase in phone customers and, to a lesser extent, higher unit pricing, with the remaining $0.4
million related to the Asset Transfer. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we gained 9,600
phone customers, excluding the effect of the Transfer Agreement, as compared to a gain of 8,000 in
the prior year period.
Advertising revenues decreased $1.5 million, or 7.2%, largely as a result of decreases in local
and, to a lesser extent, national advertising, particularly in the automotive segment.
Costs and Expenses
Service costs increased $15.0 million, or 9.7%, primarily due to higher programming expenses and,
to a much lesser extent, $2.5 million of service costs related to the Asset Transfer and phone
service costs, offset in part by lower field operating expenses. The following analysis of service
cost components excludes the effects of the Asset Transfer. Programming expenses increased 11.1%,
largely as a result of higher contractual rates charged by our programming vendors and, to a lesser
extent, greater retransmission consent fees and the recent launch of new sports programming. Phone
service costs grew 9.0%, principally due to the growth in phone customers. Field operating
expenses decreased 5.5%, mainly due to a decrease in vehicle fuel costs, offset in part by lower
capitalization of overhead costs relating to reduced customer installation activity. Service costs
as a percentage of revenues were 40.8% and 40.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $0.6 million, or 0.7%, largely as a result
of lower advertising expenses, mostly offset by $0.7 million of selling, general and administrative
expenses related to the Asset Transfer and higher taxes and fees. The following analysis of
selling, general and administrative expense components excludes the effects of the Asset Transfer.
Advertising expenses fell 5.2%, mainly due to lower commissions directly related to reduced sales
activity. Taxes and fees increased 2.4%, primarily due to higher franchise fees and, to a lesser
extent, property taxes, in certain of our service areas. Selling, general and administrative
expenses as a percentage of revenues were 19.4% and 21.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008, respectively.
Management fee expense increased $0.4 million or 5.4%, reflecting higher overhead charges at MCC.
Management fee expenses as a percentage of revenues were 1.9% for each of the six months ended June
30, 2009 and 2008.
22
Depreciation and amortization decreased $2.7 million, or 4.5%, which includes a $0.4 million offset
related to the Asset Transfer. The $3.1 million decrease before the effect of the Asset Transfer
was primarily due to an increase in the useful lives of certain fixed assets, offset in part by
greater deployment of shorter-lived customer premise equipment.
Adjusted OIBDA
Adjusted OIBDA increased $15.9 million, or 11.1%, largely as a result of increases in video, HSD
and, to a lesser extent, phone revenues and $2.0 million of Adjusted OIBDA related to the Asset
Transfer, offset in part by higher service costs.
Operating Income
Operating income increased $18.3 million, or 22.1%, mainly due to the increase in Adjusted OIBDA
and, to a much lesser extent, lower depreciation and amortization and $1.7 million of operating
income related to the Asset Transfer.
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net, decreased 2.7%, primarily due to lower market interest rates on variable
rate debt, offset in part by higher average indebtedness as a result of our $74 million
contribution to MCC under the Transfer Agreement.
Gain (Loss) on Derivatives, Net
As a result of the quarterly mark-to-market valuation of these interest rate swaps, we recorded a
net gain on derivatives of $13.2 million and a net loss on derivatives of $0.8 million, based upon
information provided by our counterparties, for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Other Expense, Net
Other expense, net was $2.8 million and $1.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, other expense, net, included $1.5
million of deferred financing costs, $1.0 million for revolving credit facility commitment fees and
$0.2 million of other fees. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, other expense, net, included
$0.9 million of revolving credit facility commitment fees and $0.8 million of deferred financing
costs.
Net Income
As a result of the factors described above, we recognized net income of $56.3 million, of which
$1.7 million was related to the Asset Transfer, for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to
a net income of $23.7 million for the prior year period.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
We have invested, and will continue to invest, in our network. The focus of our capital spending is
to enhance our reliability, as well as our capacity to accommodate customer growth and to further
deploy our advanced products and services. Although we have a high level of indebtedness and incur
significant amounts of interest expense each year, we believe that through a combination of our net
cash flows from operating activities, borrowing availability under our bank credit facility and our
ability to secure future external financing, we will meet our interest expenses and principal
payments, capital spending and other requirements. Nevertheless, there is no assurance that we will
be able to obtain sufficient future financing or, if we were able to do so, that the terms would be
favorable to us.
As of June 30, 2009, our total debt was $1.856 billion. Of this amount, $76.8 million matures
during the twelve months ending June 30, 2010. As of the same date, about 75% of our outstanding
indebtedness was at fixed interest rates or subject to interest rate protection. During the six
months ended June 30, 2009, we paid cash interest of $55.4 million, net of capitalized interest.
23
Recent Developments in the Credit Markets
We have assessed, and will continue to assess, the impact, if any, of the recent distress and
volatility in the capital and credit markets on our financial position. Further disruptions in
such markets could cause our counterparty banks to be unable to fulfill their commitments to us,
potentially reducing amounts available to us under our revolving credit commitments or subjecting
us to greater credit risk with respect to our interest rate exchange agreements. At this time, we
are not aware of any of our counterparty banks being in a position where they would be unable to
fulfill their obligations to us. Although we may be exposed to future consequences in the event of
such counterparties non-performance, we do not expect any such outcomes to be material.
We believe that we have sufficient liquidity to meet our requirements over the next two years,
which include debt maturities of $47.0 million during the remainder of 2009 and $35.5 million of
debt maturities in 2010. In addition to our cash flows from operating activities, we also have
available to us $14.1 million of cash on hand and $309.5 million of unused revolving credit
commitments as of June 30, 2009.
Operating Activities
Net cash flows provided by operating activities were $88.6 million for the six months ended June
30, 2009, primarily due to Adjusted OIBDA of $158.6 million, offset in part by interest expense of
$55.0 million and, to a lesser extent, the $14.0 million net change in our operating assets and
liabilities. The net change in our operating assets and liabilities was primarily due to an
increase in accounts receivable affiliates, of $9.4 million and, to a lesser extent, an increase
in prepaid expenses and other assets of $4.0 million and an increase in accounts receivable, net,
of $2.6 million.
Net cash flows provided by operating activities were $68.5 million for the six months ended June
30, 2008, primarily due to Adjusted OIBDA of $142.7 million, offset in part by interest expense of
$56.6 million and the $17.5 million net change in our operating assets and liabilities. The net
change in our operating assets and liabilities was mainly due to an increase in accounts receivable
affiliates of $16.7 million and, to a lesser extent, a decrease in accounts payable, accrued
expenses and other current liabilities of $4.3 million, offset in part by a decrease in accounts
receivable, net, of $2.6 million and an increase in deferred revenue of $1.0 million.
Investing Activities
Net cash flows used in investing activities, which consisted entirely of capital expenditures, were
$55.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to $70.0 million for the prior
year period. The $14.3 million decrease in capital expenditures was primarily due to higher
spending in the prior year period on customer premise equipment, service area expansion and
scalable infrastructure for digital transition deployment and HSD requirements. This decrease was
partly offset by the development and implementation of customer provisioning software for HSD and
phone customers.
Financing Activities
Net cash flows used in financing activities were $34.4 million for the six months ended June 30,
2009, mainly due to our capital contribution to MCC of $82.2 million and a dividend payment on
preferred members interest of $9.0 million, offset in part by net bank borrowings of $60.0 million
under our revolving credit facility. In February 2009, we made an $82.2 million capital
contribution to MCC under the Transfer Agreement, comprising an $8.2 million payment related to the
Asset Transfer and a $74.0 million capital contribution, which MCC ultimately used to partially
fund its cash obligation under the Exchange Agreement.
Net cash flows provided by financing activities were $19.3 million for the six months ended June
30, 2009, primarily due to net bank borrowings of $65.0 million, which largely funded dividend
payments to MCC of $22.4 million for repurchases of its Class A common stock, financing costs of
$11.4 million and dividend payments on preferred members interest of $9.0 million.
Bank Credit Facility
The average interest rates on outstanding debt under our bank credit facility (the credit
facility) as of June 30, 2009 and 2008 were 5.8% and 6.0%, respectively, including the effect of
the interest rate exchange agreements discussed below.
24
As of June 30, 2009, we had unused revolving credit commitments of $309.5 million under our credit
facility, all of which could be borrowed and used for general corporate purposes based on the terms
and conditions of our debt arrangements. As of the same date,
$52.9 million of our unused revolving credit commitments were subject to scheduled quarterly
reductions terminating on March 31, 2010; $256.6 million of our unused revolving credit commitments
expire on December 31, 2012, and are not subject to scheduled reductions prior to maturity.
Continued access to our credit facility is subject to our remaining in compliance with the
covenants of such credit facility, principally the requirement that we maintain a maximum ratio of
total senior debt to cash flow, as defined in the credit agreement, of 6.0 to 1.0.
As of June 30, 2009, approximately $9.5 million of letters of credit were issued under our credit
facility to various parties as collateral for our performance relating to insurance and franchise
requirements.
Senior Notes
We have issued senior notes totaling $500 million as of June 30, 2009. The indentures governing our
senior notes contain financial and other covenants that are generally less restrictive than those
found in our credit facility, and do not require us to maintain any financial ratios. Principal
covenants include a limitation on the incurrence of additional indebtedness based upon a maximum
ratio of total indebtedness to cash flow, as defined in these agreements, of 8.5 to 1.0. These
agreements also contain limitations on dividends, investments and distributions.
Covenant Compliance and Debt Ratings
For all periods through June 30, 2009, we were in compliance with all of the covenants under our
credit facility and senior note arrangements. There are no covenants, events of default, borrowing
conditions or other terms in our credit facility or senior note arrangements that are based on
changes in our credit rating assigned by any rating agency. We do not believe that we will have
any difficulty complying with any of the applicable covenants in the foreseeable future.
Interest Rate Swaps
We use interest rate exchange agreements, or interest rate swaps, in order to fix the rate of the
applicable Eurodollar portion of debt under our credit facility to reduce the potential volatility
in our interest expense that would otherwise result from changes in market interest rates. Our
interest rate swaps have not been designated as hedges for accounting purposes, and have been
accounted for on a mark-to-market basis as of, and for, the three and six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008.
As of June 30, 2009, we had current interest rate swaps with various banks pursuant to which the
interest rate on $900 million was fixed at a weighted average rate of 4.7%. As of the same date,
about 75% of our total outstanding indebtedness was at fixed rates, or subject to interest rate
protection. Our current interest rate swaps are scheduled to expire in the amounts of $500 million,
$100 million, $100 million and $200 million during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010, 2011
and 2012, respectively.
We have entered into forward-starting interest rate swaps that will fix rates for a two year period
at a rate of 3.3% on $100 million of floating rate debt, which will commence during the balance of
2009, and 2.9% on $100 million of floating rate debt, which will commence during 2010. We also
entered into forward-starting interest rate swaps that will fix rates for a three year period at a
weighted average rate of 3.0% on $300 million of floating rate debt, which will commence during the
balance of 2009.
The fair value of our interest rate swaps is the estimated amount that we would receive or pay to
terminate such agreements, taking into account market interest rates and the remaining time to
maturities. As of June 30, 2009, based upon mark-to-market valuation, we recorded on our
consolidated balance sheet, a long-term asset of $1.7 million, an accumulated current liability of
$26.3 million and an accumulated long-term liability of $9.6 million. As of December 31, 2008,
based upon mark-to-market valuation, we recorded on our consolidated balance sheet an accumulated
current liability of $26.7 million and an accumulated long-term liability of $20.7 million.
As a result of the mark-to-market valuations on these interest rate swaps, we recorded a
net gain on derivatives of $14.3 million and $14.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008, respectively, and a net gain on derivatives of $13.2 million and net loss on derivatives
of $0.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
There have been no material changes to our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as
previously disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
25
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities. Periodically, we evaluate our estimates, including those
related to doubtful accounts, long-lived assets, capitalized costs and accruals. We base our
estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable.
Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We
believe that the application of the critical accounting policies requires significant judgments and
estimates on the part of management. For a summary of our critical accounting policies, please
refer to our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, the amortization of
goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets is prohibited and requires such assets to be tested
annually for impairment, or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. We have determined that
our cable franchise rights and goodwill are indefinite-lived assets and therefore not amortizable.
We directly assess the value of cable franchise rights for impairment under SFAS No. 142 by
utilizing a discounted cash flow methodology. In performing an impairment test in accordance with
SFAS No. 142, we make assumptions, such as future cash flow expectations and other future benefits
related to cable franchise rights, which are consistent with the expectations of buyers and sellers
of cable systems in determining fair value. If the determined fair value of our cable franchise
rights is less than the carrying amount on the financial statements, an impairment charge would be
recognized for the difference between the fair value and the carrying value of such assets.
Goodwill impairment is determined using a two-step process. The first step compares the fair value
of a reporting unit with our carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting
unit exceeds our carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired and the
second step is unnecessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds our fair value, the
second step is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step compares
the implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill, calculated using the residual method, with
the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds the implied
fair value, the excess is recognized as an impairment loss. We conducted our annual impairment test
as of October 1, 2008.
The economic conditions currently affecting the U.S. economy and how that may impact the long-term
fundamentals of our business may have a negative impact on the fair values of the assets in our
reporting units. This may result in the recognition of an impairment loss when we perform our next
annual impairment testing during the fourth quarter of 2009.
Because there has not been a meaningful change in the long-term fundamentals of our business during
the first half of 2009, we have determined that there has been no triggering event under SFAS No.
142, and as such, no interim impairment test is required as of June 30, 2009.
Inflation and Changing Prices
Our systems costs and expenses are subject to inflation and price fluctuations. Such changes in
costs and expenses can generally be passed through to subscribers. Programming costs have
historically increased at rates in excess of inflation and are expected to continue to do so. We
believe that under the Federal Communications Commissions existing cable rate regulations we may
increase rates for cable television services to more than cover any increases in programming.
However, competitive conditions and other factors in the marketplace may limit our ability to
increase our rates.
26
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
There have been no significant changes to the information required under this Item from what was
disclosed in Item 7A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Mediacom Broadband LLC
Under the supervision and with the participation of the management of Mediacom Broadband LLC
(Mediacom), including Mediacoms Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Mediacom
evaluated the effectiveness of Mediacoms disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period
covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, Mediacoms Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that Mediacoms disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of
June 30, 2009.
There has not been any change in Mediacoms internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended June 30, 2009
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Mediacoms internal
control over financial reporting.
Mediacom Broadband Corporation
Under the supervision and with the participation of the management of Mediacom Broadband
Corporation (Mediacom Broadband), including Mediacom Broadbands Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, Mediacom Broadband evaluated the effectiveness of Mediacom Broadbands
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon
that evaluation, Mediacom Broadbands Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded
that Mediacom Broadbands disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2009.
There has not been any change in Mediacom Broadbands internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended June 30,
2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Mediacom
Broadbands internal control over financial reporting.
27
PART II
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
See Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements.
There have been no material changes in the risk factors from those disclosed in Item 1A of our
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 15d-14(a) Certifications of Mediacom Broadband LLC |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 15d-14(a) Certifications of Mediacom Broadband Corporation |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications of Mediacom Broadband LLC |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications of Mediacom Broadband Corporation |
28
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MEDIACOM BROADBAND LLC
|
|
August 7, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Mark E. Stephan
|
|
|
|
Mark E. Stephan |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
29
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MEDIACOM BROADBAND CORPORATION
|
|
August 7, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Mark E. Stephan
|
|
|
|
Mark E. Stephan |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
30
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 15d-14(a) Certifications of Mediacom Broadband LLC |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 15d-14(a) Certifications of Mediacom Broadband Corporation |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications of Mediacom Broadband LLC |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications of Mediacom Broadband Corporation |
31
Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Rocco B. Commisso, certify that:
(1) |
|
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Mediacom Broadband LLC; |
(2) |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
(3) |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
(4) |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and l5d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and |
(5) |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
August 7, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Rocco B. Commisso
|
|
|
|
Rocco B. Commisso |
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Mark E. Stephan, certify that:
(1) |
|
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Mediacom Broadband LLC; |
(2) |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
(3) |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
(4) |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and l5d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and |
(5) |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
August 7, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Mark E. Stephan
|
|
|
|
Mark E. Stephan |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Rocco B. Commisso, certify that:
(1) |
|
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Mediacom Broadband Corporation; |
(2) |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
(3) |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
(4) |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and l5d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and |
(5) |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
August 7, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Rocco B. Commisso
|
|
|
|
Rocco B. Commisso |
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Mark E. Stephan, certify that:
(1) |
|
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Mediacom Broadband Corporation; |
(2) |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
(3) |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
(4) |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and l5d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and |
(5) |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
August 7, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Mark E. Stephan
|
|
|
|
Mark E. Stephan |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
Exhibit 32.1
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mediacom Broadband LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), Rocco B. Commisso, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Mark E. Stephan,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) |
|
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and |
(2) |
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
August 7, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Rocco B. Commisso
|
|
|
|
Rocco B. Commisso |
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Mark E. Stephan
|
|
|
|
Mark E. Stephan |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
Exhibit 32.2
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mediacom Broadband Corporation (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), Rocco B. Commisso, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Mark E.
Stephan, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) |
|
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and |
(2) |
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
August 7, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Rocco B. Commisso
|
|
|
|
Rocco B. Commisso |
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Mark E. Stephan
|
|
|
|
Mark E. Stephan |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|