Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-Q
 
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008
Commission File Number: 0-29227
Mediacom Communications Corporation
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Delaware   06-1566067
(State of incorporation)   (I.R.S. Employer
    Identification Number)
100 Crystal Run Road
Middletown, NY 10941

(Address of principal executive offices)
(845) 695-2600
(Registrant’s telephone number)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
             
o Large accelerated filer   þ Accelerated filer   o Non-accelerated filer   o Smaller reporting company
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
o Yes þ No
As of October 31, 2008, there were 67,778,566 shares of Class A common stock and 27,001,944 shares of Class B common stock outstanding.
 
 

 

 


 

MEDIACOM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
TABLE OF CONTENTS
       
PART I
 
     
  4  
 
     
  4  
 
     
  5  
 
     
  6  
 
     
  7  
 
     
  17  
 
     
  30  
 
     
  30  
 
     
PART II
 
     
  30  
 
     
  30  
 
     
  30  
 
     
  30  
 
     
  30  
 
     
  30  
 
     
  31  
 
 Exhibit 31.1
 Exhibit 32.1

 

2


Table of Contents

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
You should carefully review the information contained in this Quarterly Report and in other reports or documents that we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).
In this Quarterly Report, we state our beliefs of future events and of our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify those so-called “forward-looking statements” by words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” or “continue” or the negative of those words and other comparable words. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or those we anticipate, many of which are beyond our control. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: competition for video, high-speed data and phone customers; our ability to achieve anticipated customer and revenue growth and to successfully introduce new products and services; economic downturns and other factors which may negatively affect our customers’ demand for our services; increasing programming costs and delivery expenses related to our advanced products and services; changes in laws and regulations; changes in technology; changes in assumptions underlying our critical accounting policies; fluctuations in short term interest rates which may cause our interest expense to vary from quarter to quarter; our ability to generate sufficient cash flow to meet our debt service obligations; instability in the credit markets which may affect our ability to access capital; and the other risks and uncertainties discussed in this Quarterly Report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and other reports or documents that we file from time to time with the SEC. Statements included in this Quarterly Report are based upon information known to us as of the date that this Quarterly Report is filed with the SEC, and we assume no obligation to update or alter our forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report or our other documents filed with the SEC, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as otherwise required by applicable federal securities laws.

 

3


Table of Contents

PART I
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MEDIACOM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(All dollar amounts in thousands)
(Unaudited)
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2008     2007  
ASSETS
               
CURRENT ASSETS
               
Cash
  $ 33,324     $ 19,388  
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,339 and $2,067
    82,121       81,509  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    21,360       20,630  
Deferred tax assets
    2,495       2,424  
 
           
Total current assets
    139,300       123,951  
Investment in cable television systems:
               
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $1,717,247 and $1,564,583
    1,457,962       1,412,139  
Franchise rights
    1,793,657       1,793,549  
Goodwill
    220,646       220,646  
Subscriber lists and other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $155,082 and $153,184
    8,825       10,532  
 
           
Total investment in cable television systems
    3,481,090       3,436,866  
Other assets, net of accumulated amortization of $24,997 and $27,172
    38,523       24,817  
Assets held for sale
    28,661       29,576  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 3,687,574     $ 3,615,210  
 
           
 
               
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
               
CURRENT LIABILITIES
               
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
  $ 278,827     $ 246,915  
Deferred revenue
    53,927       51,015  
Current portion of debt
    117,875       94,533  
 
           
Total current liabilities
    450,629       392,463  
Long-term debt
    3,142,125       3,120,500  
Deferred tax liabilities
    360,304       316,602  
Other non-current liabilities
    12,454       38,164  
Liabilities held for sale
    1,369       570  
 
           
Total liabilities
    3,966,881       3,868,299  
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)
               
 
               
STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
               
Class A common stock, $.01par value; 300,000,000 shares authorized; 94,842,654 shares issued and 67,642,031 shares outstanding as of September 30, 2008 and 94,293,185 shares issued and 72,011,963 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2007
    948       943  
Class B common stock, $.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 27,001,944 shares issued and outstanding
    270       270  
 
Additional paid-in capital
    1,001,686       997,404  
Accumulated deficit
    (1,128,747 )     (1,121,242 )
Treasury stock, at cost, 27,200,623 and 22,281,222 shares of Class A common stock
    (153,464 )     (130,464 )
 
           
Total stockholders’ deficit
    (279,307 )     (253,089 )
 
           
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit
  $ 3,687,574     $ 3,615,210  
 
           
The accompanying notes to the unaudited financial
statements are an integral part of these statements

 

4


Table of Contents

MEDIACOM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(All amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2008     2007     2008     2007  
 
                               
Revenues
  $ 352,553     $ 328,252     $ 1,041,732     $ 960,861  
Costs and expenses:
                               
Service costs (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)
    148,714       137,555       434,276       404,060  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    71,117       68,634       206,064       197,149  
Corporate expenses
    7,762       6,654       23,000       20,222  
Depreciation and amortization
    53,781       59,970       173,266       170,705  
 
                       
Operating income
    71,179       55,439       205,126       168,725  
 
                               
Interest expense, net
    (54,678 )     (61,185 )     (163,302 )     (180,196 )
Gain (loss) on derivatives, net
    6,006       (13,791 )     4,122       (8,972 )
Gain (loss) on sale of cable systems, net
          545       (170 )     11,326  
Other expense, net
    (5,816 )     (1,150 )     (9,650 )     (6,054 )
 
                       
Income (loss) from operations before income taxes
    16,691       (20,142 )     36,126       (15,171 )
Provision for income taxes
    (14,494 )     (14,591 )     (43,632 )     (43,086 )
 
                       
 
                               
Net income (loss)
  $ 2,197     $ (34,733 )   $ (7,506 )   $ (58,257 )
 
                       
 
                               
Basic — Weighted average shares outstanding
    94,628       108,013       95,803       109,220  
Basic — Earnings (loss) per share
  $ 0.02     $ (0.32 )   $ (0.08 )   $ (0.53 )
Diluted — Weighted average shares outstanding
    96,916       108,013       95,803       109,220  
Diluted — Earnings (loss) per share
  $ 0.02     $ (0.32 )   $ (0.08 )   $ (0.53 )
The accompanying notes to the unaudited financial
statements are an integral part of these statements

 

5


Table of Contents

MEDIACOM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(All dollar amounts in thousands)
(Unaudited)
                 
    Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,  
    2008     2007  
 
               
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
               
Net loss
  $ (7,506 )   $ (58,257 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    173,266       170,705  
(Gain) loss on derivatives, net
    (4,122 )     8,972  
Loss (gain) on sale of cable systems, net
    170       (11,326 )
Amortization of deferred financing costs
    3,653       3,817  
Share-based compensation
    3,931       4,006  
Deferred income taxes
    43,632       42,919  
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions:
               
Accounts receivable, net
    (865 )     (4,603 )
Prepaid expenses and other assets
    (4,267 )     (3,905 )
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
    (20,135 )     (9,900 )
Deferred revenue
    2,912       4,048  
Other non-current liabilities
    (2,444 )     (2,727 )
 
           
Net cash flows provided by operating activities
  $ 188,225     $ 143,749  
 
           
 
               
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
               
Capital expenditures
    (217,057 )     (182,803 )
Acquisition of cable system
          (7,274 )
Proceeds from sales of cable systems
          32,448  
 
           
Net cash flows used in investing activities
  $ (217,057 )   $ (157,629 )
 
           
 
               
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
               
New borrowings
    689,000       298,525  
Repayment of debt
    (644,032 )     (256,400 )
Repurchases of Class A common stock
    (22,389 )     (39,035 )
Proceeds from issuance of common stock in employee stock purchase plan
    490       460  
Financing costs
    (10,887 )      
Other financing activities (including book overdrafts)
    30,586       (10,592 )
 
           
Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities
  $ 42,768     $ (7,042 )
 
           
Net increase (decrease) in cash
    13,936       (20,922 )
CASH, beginning of period
    19,388       36,385  
 
           
CASH, end of period
  $ 33,324     $ 15,463  
 
           
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
               
Cash paid during the period for interest, net of amounts capitalized
  $ 166,956     $ 196,623  
 
           
The accompanying notes to the unaudited financial
statements are an integral part of these statements

 

6


Table of Contents

MEDIACOM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTING PRESENTATION AND OTHER INFORMATION
Basis of Preparation of Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Mediacom Communications Corporation (“MCC,” and collectively with its subsidiaries, “we,” “our” or “us”) has prepared these unaudited consolidated financial statements in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). We own and operate cable systems through two principal subsidiaries, Mediacom LLC and Mediacom Broadband LLC. In the opinion of management, such statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals and adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of our consolidated results of operations and financial position for the interim periods presented. The accounting policies followed during such interim periods reported are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and are consistent with those applied during annual periods. For a summary of our accounting policies and other information, refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that might be expected for future interim periods or for the full year ending December 31, 2008. Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 157,”Fair Value Measurements.” See Note 2.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year amounts to conform to the current year’s presentation.
2. RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 establishes a single authoritative definition of fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value and expands on required disclosures about fair value measurement. Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 157 for our financial assets and liabilities. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. FAS 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157,” which delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually), to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We are evaluating the impact of our nonfinancial assets and liabilities which include goodwill and other intangible assets. SFAS No. 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurement. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 on January 1, 2008 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
The following sets forth our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2008. These assets and liabilities have been categorized according to the three-level fair value hierarchy established by SFAS No. 157, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value.
 
Level 1 — Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
 
 
Level 2 — Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.
 
 
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.
As of September 30, 2008, our interest rate swap liabilities, net, were valued at $21.7 million using Level 2 inputs.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115.” SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This Statement is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. We adopted SFAS No. 159 as of January 1, 2008. We did not elect the fair value option of SFAS No. 159.

 

7


Table of Contents

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (R), “Business Combinations,” which continues to require the treatment that all business combinations be accounted for by applying the acquisition method. Under the acquisition method, the acquirer recognizes and measures the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any contingent consideration and contractual contingencies, as a whole, at their fair value as of the acquisition date. Under SFAS No. 141 (R), all transaction costs are expensed as incurred. SFAS No. 141 (R) replaces SFAS No. 141. The guidance in SFAS No. 141 (R) will be applied prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2008.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.” SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities and thereby improves the transparency of financial reporting. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. We have not completed our evaluation of SFAS No. 161 to determine the impact that adoption will have on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
3. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
We calculate earnings or loss per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share” by dividing the net income or loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share (“Diluted EPS”) is computed by dividing the net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period plus the effects of any potentially dilutive securities. Diluted EPS considers the impact of potentially dilutive securities except in periods in which there is a loss because the inclusion of the potential shares of common stock would have an anti-dilutive effect. Our potentially dilutive securities include shares of common stock which may be issued upon exercise of our stock options or vesting of restricted stock units. Diluted EPS excludes the impact of potential shares of common stock related to our stock options in periods in which the option exercise price is greater than the average market price of our Class A common stock during the period.
For the three months ended September 30, 2007 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, we generated net losses and therefore the inclusion of the potential shares of common stock would have been anti-dilutive. Accordingly, diluted loss per share equaled basic loss per share. Diluted loss per share for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 excludes approximately 2.2 million, 2.1 million and 2.2 million potential shares of common stock related to our share-based compensation plans, respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 2008, we generated net income. Accordingly, diluted earnings per share includes approximately 2.3 million potential shares of common stock related to our share-based compensation plans.

 

8


Table of Contents

4. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2008     2007  
Cable systems, equipment and subscriber devices
  $ 2,998,898     $ 2,808,187  
Vehicles
    68,769       67,468  
Furniture, fixtures and office equipment
    58,393       53,005  
Buildings and leasehold improvements
    41,636       40,880  
Land and land improvements
    7,513       7,182  
 
           
 
    3,175,209       2,976,722  
Accumulated depreciation
    (1,717,247 )     (1,564,583 )
 
           
Property, plant and equipment, net
  $ 1,457,962     $ 1,412,139  
 
           
Change in Estimate Useful lives
Effective July 1, 2008, we changed the estimated useful lives of certain plant and equipment within our cable systems in connection with our deployment of all digital video technology both in the network and at the customer’s home. These changes in asset lives were based on our plans and our experience thus far in executing such plans, to deploy all digital video technology across certain of our cable systems. This technology affords us the opportunity to increase network capacity without costly upgrades and, as such, extends the useful lives of cable plant by four years. We have also begun to provide all digital set-top boxes to our customer base as part of this all digital network deployment. In connection with the all digital set-top launch, we have reviewed the asset lives of our customer premise equipment and determined that their useful lives should be extended by two years. While the timing and extent of current deployment plans are subject to modification, management believes that extending the useful lives is appropriate and will be subject to ongoing analysis. The weighted average useful lives of such fixed assets changed as follows:
                 
    Useful lives (in years)  
    From     To  
Plant and equipment
    12       16  
 
Customer premise equipment
    5       7  
These changes were made on a prospective basis effective July 1, 2008 and resulted in a reduction of depreciation expense and a corresponding increase in net income of approximately $5.8 million and an increase to basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.06 per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008.

 

9


Table of Contents

5. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2008     2007  
Book overdrafts(1)
  $ 48,302     $ 16,971  
Accrued programming costs
    37,542       43,596  
Accrued interest
    36,818       39,588  
Accrued payroll and benefits
    25,577       25,165  
Accrued taxes and fees
    25,048       27,617  
Accrued property, plant and equipment
    22,731       11,588  
Liability under interest rate exchange agreements
    21,486        
Accrued service costs
    19,113       18,114  
Subscriber advance payments
    11,323       11,471  
Accrued telecommunications costs
    9,010       15,687  
Accounts payable
    5,928       18,528  
Other accrued expenses
    15,949       18,590  
 
           
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities
  $ 278,827     $ 246,915  
 
           
     
(1)  
Book overdrafts represent outstanding checks in excess of funds on deposit at our disbursement accounts. We transfer funds from our depository accounts to our disbursement accounts upon daily notification of checks presented for payment. Changes in book overdrafts are reported as part of cash flows from financing activities in our consolidated statement of cash flows.
6. DEBT
Debt consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2008     2007  
Bank credit facilities
  $ 2,135,000     $ 2,090,000  
77/8% senior notes due 2011
    125,000       125,000  
91/2% senior notes due 2013
    500,000       500,000  
81/2% senior notes due 2015
    500,000       500,000  
Capital lease obligations
          33  
 
           
 
    3,260,000       3,215,033  
Less: Current portion
    117,875       94,533  
 
           
Total long-term debt
  $ 3,142,125     $ 3,120,500  
 
           
Bank Credit Facilities
The average interest rates on outstanding debt under our bank credit facilities as of September 30, 2008 and 2007 were 5.0% and 6.8%, respectively, before giving effect to the interest rate exchange agreements discussed below. As of September 30, 2008, we had unused revolving credit commitments of approximately $854.8 million under our bank credit facilities, $809.7 million of which could be borrowed and used for general corporate purposes based on the terms and conditions of our debt arrangements. As of the same date, $98.5 million of our unused revolving credit commitments were subject to scheduled reductions terminating on March 31, 2010; $350.8 million and $405.5 million of our unused revolving credit commitments expire on September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2012, respectively, and are not subject to scheduled reductions prior to maturity. For all periods through September 30, 2008, we were in compliance with all of the covenants under our bank credit and senior note arrangements.

 

10


Table of Contents

On May 29, 2008, the operating subsidiaries of Mediacom Broadband entered into an incremental facility agreement that provides for a new term loan (“new term loan”) under their existing credit facility (the “Broadband credit facility”) in the principal amount of $350.0 million. On May 29, 2008, the full amount of the $350.0 million new term loan was borrowed by the operating subsidiaries of Mediacom Broadband. Approximately $335.0 million of the proceeds from the new term loan were used to repay the outstanding balance of the revolving credit portion of the Broadband credit facility, without any reduction in the revolving credit commitments. The balance of the proceeds from the new term loan were used for general corporate purposes.
Borrowings under the new term loan bear interest at a floating rate or rates equal to LIBOR or the prime rate, plus a margin of 3.50% for LIBOR loans and a margin of 2.50% for prime rate loans. For the first four years of the new term loan, LIBOR and the prime rate applicable to the new term loan are subject to a minimum of 3.00% in the case of LIBOR and a minimum of 4.00% in the case of the prime rate. The new term loan matures on January 3, 2016. The obligations of the operating subsidiaries under the new term loan are governed by the terms of the Broadband credit facility.
As of September 30, 2008, approximately $19.3 million of letters of credit were issued under our bank credit facilities to various parties as collateral for our performance relating to insurance and franchise requirements.
Interest Rate Exchange Agreements
We use interest rate exchange agreements in order to fix the interest rate on our floating rate debt. As of September 30, 2008, we had interest rate exchange agreements with various banks pursuant to which the interest rate on $1.1 billion was fixed at a weighted average rate of approximately 5.0%. As of the same date, about 68.3% of our outstanding indebtedness was at fixed market rates or subject to interest rate protection. These agreements are scheduled to expire in the amounts of $800.0 million, $200.0 million and $100.0 million during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively, and have been accounted for on a mark-to-market basis as of, and for the three and nine months ended, September 30, 2008 and 2007. Under the terms of all of our interest rate exchange agreements, we are exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other parties. However, due to the continued high creditworthiness of our counterparties, which are major banking firms with investment grade ratings, we do not anticipate their nonperformance.
In September 2008, we entered into forward starting interest rate exchange agreements that fixed interest rates at a weighted average of approximately 3.2% on $200.0 million of floating rate debt for two years, commencing on May 1, 2009 and approximately 3.7% on $200.0 million of floating rate debt for three years, commencing on June 30, 2009. These agreements have been accounted for on a mark-to-market basis as of, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008.
The fair value of the interest rate exchange agreements is the estimated amount that we would receive or pay to terminate such agreements, taking into account market interest rates, the remaining time to maturities and other factors. As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, based on the mark-to-market valuation, we recorded on our consolidated balance sheets an accumulated liability for derivatives of $21.7 million and $25.8 million, respectively. We recorded in our consolidated statements of operations a net gain on derivatives of $6.0 million and a net loss on derivatives of $13.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. We recorded a net gain on derivatives of $4.1 million and a net loss on derivatives of $9.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
7. STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Stock Repurchase Plans
As of December 31, 2007, approximately $20.0 million remained available under our Class A common stock repurchase program; in May 2008, the Board of Directors authorized an additional $50.0 million Class A common stock repurchase program. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we repurchased approximately 4.8 million shares of our Class A common stock for an aggregate cost of $22.4 million, at an average price of $4.68 per share. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we did not repurchase any shares of our Class A common stock. As of September 30, 2008, approximately $47.6 million remained available under the Class A common stock repurchase program.

 

11


Table of Contents

Share-based Compensation
Total share-based compensation expense was as follows (dollars in thousands):
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    September 30,  
    2008     2007  
Share-based compensation expense by type of award:
               
Employee stock options
  $ 365     $ 428  
Employee stock purchase plan
    79       73  
Restricted stock units
    1,000       818  
 
           
 
               
Total share-based compensation expense
  $ 1,444     $ 1,319  
 
           
                 
    Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,  
    2008     2007  
Share-based compensation expense by type of award:
               
Employee stock options
  $ 1,191     $ 1,521  
Employee stock purchase plan
    224       211  
Restricted stock units
    2,516       2,274  
 
           
 
               
Total share-based compensation expense
  $ 3,931     $ 4,006  
 
           
During the three months ended September 30, 2008, no restricted stock units or stock options were granted under our compensation programs. Each of the restricted stock units and stock options in our stock compensation programs are exchangeable and exercisable, respectively, into a share of our Class A common stock. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, approximately 2,000 restricted stock units were vested and 29,000 stock options were exercised.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, approximately 631,000 restricted stock units were granted with a weighted average fair value of $4.70 per restricted stock unit. For the same period, stock options to purchase approximately 676,000 shares of Class A common stock were granted with a weighted average exercise price of $4.34 and a weighted average fair value of $2.14 per stock option. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, approximately 385,000 restricted stock units were vested and 29,000 stock options were exercised.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Under our employee stock purchase plan, all employees are allowed to participate in the purchase of shares of our Class A common stock at a 15% discount on the date of the allocation. Shares purchased by employees under our plan amounted to approximately 137,000 and 271,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008. Shares purchased by employees under our plan amounted to approximately 81,000 and 158,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007. The net proceeds to us were approximately $0.5 million for each of the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 and $1.0 million and $0.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.

 

12


Table of Contents

8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Legal Proceedings
Mediacom LLC, one of our wholly owned subsidiaries, is named as a defendant in a putative class action, captioned Gary Ogg and Janice Ogg v. Mediacom LLC, pending in the Circuit Court of Clay County, Missouri, by which the plaintiffs are seeking class-wide damages for alleged trespasses on land owned by private parties. The lawsuit was originally filed in April 2001. The lawsuit alleges that Mediacom LLC, in areas where there was no cable franchise, failed to obtain permission from landowners to place its fiber interconnection cable notwithstanding the possession of agreements or permission from other third parties. An order declaring that this action is appropriate for class relief was entered in April 2006. While the parties continue to contest liability, there also remains a dispute as to the proper measure of damages. Based on a report by their experts, the plaintiffs claimed compensatory damages of approximately $14.5 million. Legal fees, prejudgment interest, potential punitive damages and other costs could increase that estimate to approximately $26.0 million. The plaintiffs have recently proposed an alternative damage theory of $40.0 million in compensatory damages. On July 23, 2008, Mediacom LLC filed a motion to strike the expert testimony presented by plaintiffs in its first damage theory and another motion to preclude plaintiffs’ presentation of the second alternative damage theory. We are unable to reasonably determine the amount of our final liability in this lawsuit, as our experts have estimated our liability to be within the range of approximately $0.1 million to $2.3 million. This estimate does not include any estimate of damages for prejudgment interest, attorneys’ fees or punitive damages. We believe, however, that the amount of such liability, as stated by any of the parties, would not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, cash flows or business. There can be no assurance that the actual liability would not exceed this estimated range. A trial date of November 3, 2008 was set for the claim by the class representatives, Gary and Janice Ogg, but has been postponed until January 26, 2009. In the interim, motions to strike testimony from plaintiff’s experts and the recently restated theory that plaintiff’s espouse were argued before the court. Mediacom LLC continues to vigorously defend against any claims made by the plaintiffs, including at trial, and on appeal, if necessary. Mediacom LLC has tendered the lawsuit to our insurance carrier for defense and indemnification. The carrier has agreed to defend Mediacom LLC under a reservation of rights, and a declaratory judgment action is pending regarding the carrier’s defense and coverage responsibilities.
We are involved in various other legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these other matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, cash flows or business.
9. INCOME TAXES
On a quarterly basis, we evaluate discrete tax matters occurring during the period. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we have again determined that deferred tax assets from net operating loss carryforwards that were created in the respective periods will not be realized under the more-likely-than-not standard required by SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” As a result, we increased our valuation allowance recorded against these assets. We have utilized APB No. 28, “Interim Financial Reporting,” to record income taxes on an interim period basis. A tax provision of $14.5 million and $14.6 million was recorded for each of the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. A tax provision of $43.6 million and $43.1 million was recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The respective tax provision amounts substantially represent the increase in the deferred tax liabilities related to the basis differences of our indefinite-lived intangible assets.
SFAS No. 109 requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. We periodically assess the likelihood of realization of our deferred tax assets considering all available evidence, both positive and negative, including our most recent performance, the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, our forecast of taxable income in future periods and the availability of prudent tax planning strategies. As a result of these assessments in prior periods, we have established valuation allowances on a portion of our deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty surrounding the realization of these assets.

 

13


Table of Contents

On July 13, 2006, the FASB issued FIN No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.” FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entity’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attributes for financial statement disclosure of tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. Under FIN 48, the impact of an uncertain income tax position on the income tax return must be recognized at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon audit by the relevant taxing authority. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained. Additionally, FIN 48 provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. We adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007, however the adoption did not have a material effect on us, and resulted in no adjustment to retained earnings as of January 1, 2007. We have no unrecognized tax benefits as of the adoption date and as of September 30, 2008. We do not think it is reasonably possible that the total amount of unrealized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months.
We file U.S. federal consolidated income tax returns and income tax returns in various state and local jurisdictions. Our 2005, 2006 and 2007 U.S. federal tax years and various state and local tax years from 2004 through 2007 remain subject to income tax examinations by tax authorities.
We classify interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, no interest and penalties were accrued.
10. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Mediacom Management Corporation (“Mediacom Management”), a Delaware corporation, holds a 1.0% direct ownership interest in Mediacom California LLC, which in turn holds a 1.0% interest in Mediacom Arizona LLC. Revenues from these entities represent less than 1.0% of our total revenues. Mediacom Management is wholly-owned by the Chairman and CEO of MCC.
One of our directors is a partner of a law firm that performs various legal services for us. For the three months ended September 30, 2008, less than $0.1 million was paid to this law firm for services performed. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, approximately $0.1 million was paid to this law firm for services performed.
11. REPURCHASE OF MEDIACOM CLASS A COMMON STOCK
On September 7, 2008, we signed a definitive agreement with Shivers Investments, LLC and Shivers Trading & Operating Company (collectively, “Shivers”), both affiliates of Morris Communications Company, LLC. Under the definitive agreement, we will exchange 100% of the shares of stock of a newly-created subsidiary, which will hold non-strategic cable television systems serving approximately 25,000 basic subscribers, and $110 million of cash, for 28.3 million shares of our Class A common stock held by Shivers.
We expect to fund the cash portion of the transaction with cash on hand and borrowings made under our revolving credit commitments. Closing of the transaction is expected around year-end 2008, subject to the receipt of certain regulatory approvals and other customary conditions. As of September 30, 2008, giving pro-forma effect to this stock repurchase, our total outstanding shares would be approximately 66.3 million, representing 39.3 million and 27.0 million of our Class A stock and Class B stock, respectively. Both Morris Communications and Shivers are controlled by William S. Morris III, a member of Mediacom’s Board of Directors.

 

14


Table of Contents

The results of operations for the sale assets were as follows (in thousands):
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,     September 30,     September 30,  
    2008     2007     2008     2007  
 
                               
Revenues
  $ 5,726     $ 5,435     $ 16,822     $ 16,017  
Pre-tax net income
  $ 774     $ 479     $ 1,643     $ 1,556  
The sale assets from the Morris transaction are presented below under the caption “Assets held for sale” and “Liabilities held for sale” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2008     2007  
Assets held for sale:
               
Cash
  $ 28     $  
Accounts receivable, net
    670       587  
Prepaid and other current assets
    133       62  
Property, plant and equipment, net
    23,343       24,288  
Franchise rights, net
    4,487       4,639  
 
           
Total assets held for sale
  $ 28,661     $ 29,576  
 
           
 
               
Liabilities held for sale:
               
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
  $ 1,369     $ 570  
 
           
Total liabilities held for sale
  $ 1,369     $ 570  
 
           
Our Class A common stock has had significant volatility during the months of September and October 2008. A gain or loss on the transaction with Shivers will depend, in part, on the price of our Class A common stock on the closing date, and therefore we are currently unable to reasonably estimate our potential gain or loss from this transaction. Should our Class A common stock price not recover to levels at or above $4.95, a loss will likely occur and could be material to our consolidated statements of operations. On September 30, 2008, our stock price was $5.92.

 

15


Table of Contents

12. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” the amortization of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets is prohibited and requires such assets to be tested annually for impairment, or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. We have determined that our cable franchise rights and goodwill are indefinite-lived assets and therefore not amortizable.
We directly assess the value of cable franchise rights for impairment under SFAS No. 142 by utilizing a discounted cash flow methodology. In performing an impairment test in accordance with SFAS No. 142, we make assumptions, such as future cash flow expectations and other future benefits related to cable franchise rights, which are consistent with the expectations of buyers and sellers of cable systems in determining fair value. If the determined fair value of our cable franchise rights is less than the carrying amount on the financial statements, an impairment charge would be recognized for the difference between the fair value and the carrying value of such assets.
Goodwill impairment is determined using a two-step process. The first step compares the fair value of a reporting unit with our carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds our carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired and the second step is unnecessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds our fair value, the second step is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill, calculated using the residual method, with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds the implied fair value, the excess is recognized as an impairment loss. We conduct our annual impairment test as of October 1, 2008.
Our Class A common stock price has had significant volatility during September and October 2008, largely caused by a precipitous drop in equity securities’ prices across all sectors of the United States. We do not believe that our stock price is the sole indicator of the underlying value of the assets in our reporting units. In addition, there has not been a material decline in the fundamentals of our business. We have therefore determined that this short-term volatility in our stock price does not qualify as a triggering event under SFAS No. 142 and, as such, no interim impairment test is required as of September 30, 2008.
The economic conditions currently affecting the U.S. economy and how that may impact the fundamentals of our business, together with the recent decline in our stock price, may have a negative impact on the fair values of the assets in our reporting units. This may result in the recognition of an impairment loss when we perform our annual impairment testing during the fourth quarter of 2008.

 

16


Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements as of, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, and with our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. Certain items have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation.
Overview
Mediacom Communications Corporation is the nation’s eighth largest cable television company based on the number of basic video subscribers, and among the leading cable operators focused on serving the smaller cities and towns in the United States. Through our interactive broadband network, we provide our customers with a wide array of advanced products and services, including video services such as video-on-demand, high-definition television (“HDTV”) and digital video recorders (“DVRs”), high-speed data (“HSD”) and phone service. We offer triple-play bundles of video, HSD and phone to 91% of our estimated homes passed. Bundled products and services offer our customers a single provider contact for ordering, provisioning, billing and customer care.
As of September 30, 2008, our cable systems passed an estimated 2.85 million homes and served 1.32 million basic subscribers in 22 states. We provide digital video services to 624,000 customers, representing a digital penetration of 47.1% of our basic subscribers; HSD service to 726,000 customers, representing a HSD penetration of 25.5% of our estimated homes passed; and phone service to 239,000 customers, representing a penetration of 9.2% of our estimated marketable phone homes.
We evaluate our performance, in part, by measuring the number of revenue generating units (“RGUs”) we serve, which represent the total of basic subscribers and digital, HSD and phone customers. As of September 30, 2008, we served 2.91 million RGUs, an increase of 9.0% over the end of the prior year period.
Revenues, Costs and Expenses
Video revenues primarily represent monthly subscription fees charged to customers for our core cable television products and services (including basic and digital cable programming services, wire maintenance, equipment rental and services to commercial establishments), pay-per-view charges, installation, reconnection and late payment fees and other ancillary revenues. HSD revenues primarily represent monthly fees charged to customers, including small to medium sized commercial establishments, for our HSD products and services and equipment rental fees, as well as fees charged to medium to large sized businesses for our scalable, fiber-based enterprise network products and services. Phone revenues primarily represent monthly fees charged to customers. Advertising revenues represent the sale of advertising time on various channels.
Significant service costs include: programming expenses; employee expenses related to wages and salaries of technical personnel who maintain our cable network, perform customer installation activities and provide customer support; HSD costs, including costs of bandwidth connectivity and customer provisioning; phone service costs, including delivery and other expenses; and field operating costs, including outside contractors, vehicle, utilities and pole rental expenses.
Video programming costs, which are generally paid on a per subscriber basis, represent our largest single expense and have historically increased due to both increases in the rates charged for existing programming services and the introduction of new programming services to our customers. These costs are expected to continue to grow principally because of contractual unit rate increases and the increasing demands of television broadcast station owners for retransmission consent fees. As a consequence, it is expected that our video gross margins will decline as increases in programming costs outpace growth in video revenues.

 

17


Table of Contents

Until recently, we generally have obtained retransmission consent for stations in our markets without being required to provide consideration that did not result in some offsetting value to us. The traditional retransmission consent process is based on three year cycles, with the current cycle ending December 31, 2008. In some prior negotiations we have entered into longer term agreements so that not all of the broadcast stations carried by us are up for renegotiation at this time. Most owners of multiple broadcast stations have become much more aggressive in demanding significant cash payments from us and other cable operators, DBS providers and local telephone companies. Consequently, we believe that the cost to secure retransmission consent in 2009 and beyond will rise significantly. In some cases, refusal to meet the demands of broadcast station owners could result in the loss of our ability to retransmit those stations to our subscribers. That could cause some of our existing or potential new subscribers to switch to, or choose, competitors which offer the stations.
Significant selling, general and administrative expenses include: wages and salaries for our call centers, customer service and support and administrative personnel; franchise fees and taxes; marketing; bad debt; billing; advertising; and office costs related to telecommunications and office administration.
Adjusted OIBDA
We define Adjusted OIBDA as operating income before depreciation and amortization and non-cash, share-based compensation charges. Adjusted OIBDA is one of the primary measures used by management to evaluate our performance and to forecast future results but is not a financial measure calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States. It is also a significant performance measure in our annual incentive compensation programs. We believe Adjusted OIBDA is useful for investors because it enables them to assess our performance in a manner similar to the methods used by management, and provides a measure that can be used to analyze, value and compare the companies in the cable television industry, which may have different depreciation and amortization policies, as well as different non-cash, share-based compensation programs. Adjusted OIBDA and similar measures are used in calculating compliance with the covenants of our debt arrangements. A limitation of Adjusted OIBDA, however, is that it excludes depreciation and amortization, which represents the periodic costs of certain capitalized tangible and intangible assets used in generating revenues in our business. Management utilizes a separate process to budget, measure and evaluate capital expenditures. In addition, Adjusted OIBDA has the limitation of not reflecting the effect of the our non-cash, share-based compensation charges.
Adjusted OIBDA should not be regarded as an alternative to either operating income or net income (loss) as an indicator of operating performance nor should it be considered in isolation or as a substitute for financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. We believe that operating income is the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to Adjusted OIBDA.
Retransmission Consent
Prior to February 2007, cable systems serving our subscribers carried the broadcast signals of 22 local broadcast stations owned or programmed by Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. (“Sinclair”) under a month-to-month retransmission arrangement terminable at the end of any month on 45-days notice. Eleven of these stations are affiliates of one of the “big-4” networks (ABC, CBS, FOX and NBC) that we deliver to approximately half of our total subscribers. The other stations are affiliates of the recently launched CW or MyNetwork broadcast networks or are unaffiliated with a national broadcast network.
On September 28, 2006, Sinclair exercised its right to deliver notice to us to terminate retransmission of all of its stations effective December 1, 2006, but subsequently agreed to extend our right to carriage of its signals until January 5, 2007. We and Sinclair were unable to reach agreement, and on January 5, 2007, Sinclair directed us to discontinue carriage of its stations. On February 2, 2007, we and Sinclair reached a multi-year agreement and Sinclair stations were immediately restored on the affected cable systems. As a result of this retransmission consent dispute, we experienced higher levels of basic subscriber losses and operating expenses in the fourth quarter of 2006 and the first quarter of 2007.

 

18


Table of Contents

Actual Results of Operations
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2007
The following tables set forth the unaudited consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 (dollars in thousands and percentage changes that are not meaningful are marked NM):
                                 
    Three Months Ended              
    September 30,              
    2008     2007     $ Change     % Change  
 
                               
Revenues
  $ 352,553     $ 328,252     $ 24,301       7.4 %
Costs and expenses:
                               
Service costs (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)
    148,714       137,555       11,159       8.1 %
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    71,117       68,634       2,483       3.6 %
Corporate expenses
    7,762       6,654       1,108       16.7 %
Depreciation and amortization
    53,781       59,970       (6,189 )     (10.3 %)
 
                       
Operating income
    71,179       55,439       15,740       28.4 %
 
Interest expense, net
    (54,678 )     (61,185 )     6,507       (10.6 %)
Gain (loss) on derivatives, net
    6,006       (13,791 )     19,797     NM  
Gain on sale of cable systems, net
          545       (545 )   NM  
Other expense, net
    (5,816 )     (1,150 )     (4,666 )   NM  
 
                       
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
    16,691       (20,142 )     36,833     NM  
Provision for income taxes
    (14,494 )     (14,591 )     97       (0.7 %)
 
                       
Net income (loss)
  $ 2,197     $ (34,733 )   $ 36,930     NM  
 
                       
 
                               
Adjusted OIBDA
  $ 126,404     $ 116,728     $ 9,676       8.3 %
 
                       
                                 
    September 30,              
    2008     2007     $ Change     % Change  
 
Adjusted OIBDA
  $ 126,404     $ 116,728     $ 9,676       8.3 %
Non-cash, share-based compensation
    (1,444 )     (1,319 )     (125 )     9.5 %
Depreciation and amortization
    (53,781 )     (59,970 )     6,189       (10.3 %)
 
                       
Operating income
  $ 71,179     $ 55,439     $ 15,740       28.4 %
 
                       

 

19


Table of Contents

Revenues
The following tables set forth the unaudited revenues, and selected subscriber, customer and average monthly revenue statistics for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 (dollars in thousands, except per subscriber and RGU data):
                                 
    Three Months Ended              
    September 30,              
    2008     2007     $ Change     % Change  
Video
  $ 229,545     $ 225,887     $ 3,658       1.6 %
HSD
    82,447       70,528       11,919       16.9 %
Phone
    23,697       14,443       9,254       64.1 %
Advertising
    16,864       17,394       (530 )     (3.0 %)
 
                       
Total Revenues
  $ 352,553     $ 328,252     $ 24,301       7.4 %
 
                       
                                 
    September 30,     Increase/        
    2008     2007     (Decrease)     % Change  
Basic subscribers
    1,324,000       1,331,000       (7,000 )     (0.5 %)
Digital customers
    624,000       541,000       83,000       15.3 %
HSD customers
    726,000       636,000       90,000       14.2 %
Phone customers
    239,000       165,000       74,000       44.8 %
 
                       
RGUs (1)
    2,913,000       2,673,000       240,000       9.0 %
 
                       
Average total monthly revenue per basic subscriber (2)
  $ 88.86     $ 81.81     $ 7.05       8.6 %
     
(1)  
RGUs represent the total of basic subscribers and digital, HSD and phone customers.
 
(2)  
Represents total average monthly revenues for the quarter divided by total average basic subscribers for such period.
Revenues rose 7.4%, largely attributable to growth in our HSD and phone customers and, to a lesser extent, an increase in video revenues. Average total monthly revenue per basic subscriber increased 8.6%.
Video revenues grew 1.6%, largely due to customer growth in our advanced video products and services and, to a lesser extent, basic video rate increases offset in part by a lower number of basic subscribers. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we gained 3,000 basic subscribers, compared to a loss of 13,000 basic subscribers for the same period last year. Digital customers grew by 25,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to an increase of 9,000 in the prior year period. As of September 30, 2008, 32.6% of digital customers were taking our DVR and/or HDTV services, as compared to 22.4% at the end of the prior year period.
HSD revenues rose 16.9%, largely due to a 14.2% year-over-year increase in HSD customers and, to a lesser extent, growth in our enterprise network products and services. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, HSD customers grew by 24,000, as compared to a gain of 23,000 in the prior year period.
Phone revenues grew 64.1%, mainly due to a 44.8% year-over-year increase in phone customers and a reduction in discounted pricing. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, phone customers grew by 17,000, as compared to a gain of 21,000 in the prior year period. As of September 30, 2008, our phone service was marketed to 91% of our estimated 2.85 million homes passed.
Advertising revenues decreased 3.0%, largely as a result of a decrease in automotive advertising and one less week in the broadcast calendar compared to the prior year period, offset in part by an increase in political advertising.

 

20


Table of Contents

Costs and Expenses
Service costs rose 8.1%, primarily due to increases in programming, phone service, field operating and personnel expenses, offset in part by lower HSD costs. Programming expenses grew 8.9%, principally as a result of higher contractual rates charged by our programming vendors. Phone service costs rose 38.0%, primarily due to the growth in phone customers. Field operating expenses grew 11.5%, largely due to higher vehicle fuel and repair costs. Personnel costs rose 13.1%, primarily due to increased staffing and favorable insurance claim experience in the prior year period. HSD expenses decreased 21.4% due to a reduction in product delivery costs, offset in part by HSD customer growth. Service costs as a percentage of revenues were 42.2% and 41.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Selling, general and administrative expenses rose 3.6%, principally due to higher customer service employee costs, greater marketing expenses and an increase in taxes and fees, offset in part by a decrease in telecommunications and billing expenses. Customer service employee costs rose 16.5%, principally due to additional staffing. Marketing expenses grew 9.0%, primarily due to greater expenses related to sales activity, higher staffing levels and more frequent direct mailing campaigns, offset in part by a reduction in other advertising. Taxes and fees rose 7.7% due to higher property taxes in certain of our service areas. Telecommunications costs decreased 24.4%, principally due to more favorable rates. Billing expenses fell 13.3%, primarily due to decreased processing fees, offset in part by higher bank fees and credit card charges. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues were 20.2% and 20.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Corporate expenses reflect compensation of corporate employees and general corporate overhead. Corporate expenses rose 16.7%, primarily due to higher staffing levels. Corporate expenses as a percentage of revenues were 2.2% and 2.0% for each of the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Depreciation and amortization decreased 10.3%, largely as a result of an increase in the useful lives of certain fixed assets, offset in part by increased depreciation on the deployment of shorter-lived customer premise equipment.
Adjusted OIBDA
Adjusted OIBDA increased 8.3%, due to growth in HSD, phone and, to a lesser extent, video revenues, offset in part by higher service costs and, to a lesser extent, selling, general and administrative expenses.
Operating Income
Operating income grew 28.4%, due to the increase in Adjusted OIBDA and, to a lesser extent, lower depreciation and amortization.
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net decreased 10.6%, primarily due to lower market interest rates on variable rate debt, offset in part by higher average indebtedness.
Gain (Loss) on Derivatives, Net
We enter into interest rate exchange agreements, or “interest rate swaps,” with counterparties to fix the interest rate on a portion of our variable rate debt to reduce the potential volatility in our interest expense that would otherwise result from changes in variable market interest rates. As of September 30, 2008, we had interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $1.1 billion. The changes in their mark-to-market values are derived primarily from changes in market interest rates, the decrease in their time to maturity and other factors. These swaps have not been designated as hedges for accounting purposes. As a result of the quarterly mark-to-market valuation of these interest rate swaps, we recorded a net gain on derivatives of $6.0 million and a net loss on derivatives of $13.8 million, based upon information provided by our counterparties, for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

 

21


Table of Contents

Other Expense, Net
Other expense, net was $5.8 million and $1.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. In the most recent period, other expense, net included $3.0 million for transaction costs related to the repurchase of our Class A common stock (see Liquidity and Capital Resources), $1.3 million for commitment fees and $0.7 million related to deferred financing costs. In the comparable prior year period, other expense, net included $1.0 million related to deferred financing costs and $0.3 million for commitment fees.
Provision for Income Taxes
Provision for income taxes was $14.5 million and $14.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. These provisions for income taxes for each of the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 resulted from non-cash charges related to our deferred tax asset positions. See Note 9 of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Net Income (Loss)
As a result of the factors described above, we recognized net income of $2.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to a net loss of $34.7 million for the prior year period.
Actual Results of Operations
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
The following tables set forth the unaudited consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 (dollars in thousands and percentage changes that are not meaningful are marked NM):
                                 
    Nine Months Ended              
    September 30,              
    2008     2007     $ Change     % Change  
 
                               
Revenues
  $ 1,041,732     $ 960,861     $ 80,871       8.4 %
Costs and expenses:
                               
Service costs (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)
    434,276       404,060       30,216       7.5 %
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    206,064       197,149       8,915       4.5 %
Corporate expenses
    23,000       20,222       2,778       13.7 %
Depreciation and amortization
    173,266       170,705       2,561       1.5 %
 
                       
Operating income
    205,126       168,725       36,401       21.6 %
 
                               
Interest expense, net
    (163,302 )     (180,196 )     16,894       (9.4 %)
Gain (loss) on derivatives, net
    4,122       (8,972 )     13,094     NM  
(Loss) gain on sale of cable systems, net
    (170 )     11,326       (11,496 )   NM  
Other expense, net
    (9,650 )     (6,054 )     (3,596 )     59.4 %
 
                       
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
    36,126       (15,171 )     51,297     NM  
Provision for income taxes
    (43,632 )     (43,086 )     (546 )     1.3 %
 
                       
Net loss
  $ (7,506 )   $ (58,257 )   $ 50,751       (87.1 %)
 
                       
 
                               
Adjusted OIBDA
  $ 382,323     $ 343,436     $ 38,887       11.3 %
 
                       

 

22


Table of Contents

                                 
    September 30,              
    2008     2007     $ Change     % Change  
 
                               
Adjusted OIBDA
  $ 382,323     $ 343,436     $ 38,887       11.3 %
Non-cash, share-based compensation
    (3,931 )     (4,006 )     75       (1.9 %)
Depreciation and amortization
    (173,266 )     (170,705 )     (2,561 )     1.5 %
 
                       
Operating income
  $ 205,126     $ 168,725     $ 36,401       21.6 %
 
                       
The following tables set forth the unaudited revenues, and selected subscriber, customer and average monthly revenue statistics for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 (dollars in thousands, except per subscriber and RGU data):
                                 
    Nine Months Ended              
    September 30,              
    2008     2007     $ Change     % Change  
Video
  $ 689,194     $ 667,544     $ 21,650       3.2 %
HSD
    239,463       205,481       33,982       16.5 %
Phone
    65,436       39,268       26,168       66.6 %
Advertising
    47,639       48,568       (929 )     (1.9 %)
 
                       
Total Revenues
  $ 1,041,732     $ 960,861     $ 80,871       8.4 %
 
                       
                                 
    September 30,     Increase/        
    2008     2007     (Decrease)     % Change  
Basic subscribers
    1,324,000       1,331,000       (7,000 )     (0.5 %)
Digital customers
    624,000       541,000       83,000       15.3 %
HSD customers
    726,000       636,000       90,000       14.2 %
Phone customers
    239,000       165,000       74,000       44.8 %
 
                       
RGUs
    2,913,000       2,673,000       240,000       9.0 %
 
                       
Average total monthly revenue per basic subscriber
  $ 87.42     $ 78.76     $ 8.66       11.0 %
Revenues rose 8.4%, largely attributable to growth in our HSD and phone customers and an increase in video revenues. Average total monthly revenue per basic subscriber increased 11.0%.
Video revenues grew 3.2%, largely due to basic video rate increases and customer growth in our advanced video products and services, offset in part by a lower number of basic subscribers. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the number of basic subscribers was unchanged, compared to a reduction in 49,000 basic subscribers for the same period last year, which includes a significant number of basic subscribers lost in connection with the aforementioned retransmission consent dispute, and the sale during the period of cable systems serving on a net basis 3,000 basic subscribers.
HSD revenues rose 16.5%, primarily due to a 14.2% year-over-year increase in HSD customers and, to a lesser extent, growth in our enterprise network products and services.
Phone revenues grew 66.6%, mainly due to a 44.8% year-over-year increase in phone customers and a reduction in discounted pricing.
Advertising revenues were lower by 1.9%, largely as a result of an overall reduction in national advertising.

 

23


Table of Contents

Costs and Expenses
Service costs rose 7.5%, primarily due to increases in programming, phone service and field operating expenses, offset in part by lower HSD costs. Programming expenses grew 7.1%, principally as a result of higher contractual rates charged by our programming vendors. Phone service costs rose 53.1%, mainly due to the growth in phone customers. Field operating expenses grew 16.9%, primarily due to greater vehicle fuel and repair expenses, lower capitalization of overhead costs and increased pole rental costs, offset in part by non-recurring expenses in the prior year period relating to the retransmission consent dispute noted above and lower insurance costs. HSD expenses decreased 21.5% due to a reduction in product delivery costs, offset in part by HSD customer growth. Service costs as a percentage of revenues were 41.7% and 42.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Selling, general and administrative expenses rose 4.5%, principally due to higher expenses related to marketing and customer service employee costs, offset in part by a decrease in telecommunications expenses. Marketing expenses grew 15.2%, primarily due to greater expenses tied to sales activity, higher staffing levels, more frequent direct mailing campaigns and greater use of third-party sales support, offset in part by a reduction in other advertising. Customer service employee costs rose 13.3%, principally due to higher staffing levels. Telecommunications costs fell 19.4%, primarily due to more favorable rates. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues were 19.8% and 20.5% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Corporate expenses rose 13.7%, primarily due to higher staffing levels. Corporate expenses as a percentage of revenues were 2.2% and 2.1% for each of the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Depreciation and amortization rose 1.5%, primarily due to increased deployment of shorter-lived customer premise equipment and scalable infrastructure components, mostly offset by an increase in the useful lives of certain fixed assets.
Adjusted OIBDA
Adjusted OIBDA increased 11.3%, due to growth in HSD, video and phone revenues, offset in part by higher service costs and to a lesser extent selling, general and administrative expenses.
Operating Income
Operating income grew 21.6%, primarily due to the increase in Adjusted OIBDA.
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net, decreased 9.4%, primarily due to lower market interest rates on variable rate debt, offset in part by higher average indebtedness.
Gain (Loss) on Derivatives, Net
We enter into interest rate exchange agreements, or “interest rate swaps,” with counterparties to fix the interest rate on a portion of our variable rate debt to reduce the potential volatility in our interest expense that would otherwise result from changes in variable market interest rates. As of September 30, 2008, we had interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $1.1 billion. The changes in their mark-to-market values are derived primarily from changes in market interest rates, the decrease in their time to maturity and other factors. These swaps have not been designated as hedges for accounting purposes. As a result of the quarterly mark-to-market valuation of these interest rate swaps, we recorded a net gain on derivatives amounting to $4.1 million and a net loss on derivatives of $9.0 million, based upon information provided by our counterparties, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
(Loss) Gain on Sale of Cable Systems, Net
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we sold cable systems for $32.4 million and recorded a net gain on sale of $11.3 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, there was a $0.2 million negative adjustment related to a prior sale.

 

24


Table of Contents

Other Expense, Net
Other expense, net was $9.7 million and $6.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. In the most recent period, other expense, net included $3.4 million for commitment fees, $3.0 million for transaction costs related to the repurchase of our Class A common stock (see Liquidity and Capital Resources), and $2.4 million related to deferred financing costs. In the comparable prior year period, other expense, net included $3.1 million related to deferred financing costs and $3.0 million for commitment fees.
Provision for Income Taxes
Provision for income taxes was $43.6 million and $43.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. These provisions for income taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 resulted from non-cash charges related to our deferred tax asset positions. See Note 9 of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Net Loss
As a result of the factors described above, we recognized a net loss of $7.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to a net loss of $58.3 million for the prior year period.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
We have invested, and will continue to invest, in our network to enhance our reliability and capacity in customer growth, and in the further deployment of advanced broadband services. Our capital spending today is devoted primarily to customer growth and the deployment of advanced services. We have a high level of indebtedness and incur significant amounts of interest expense each year. We believe that we will meet interest expense and principal payments, capital spending and other requirements through a combination of our net cash flows from operating activities, borrowing availability under our bank credit facilities, and our ability to secure future external financing. However, there is no assurance that we will be able to obtain sufficient future financing, or, if we were able to do so, that the terms would be favorable to us.
As of September 30, 2008, our total debt was $3,260.0 million. Of this amount, $117.9 million matures within the year ending September 30, 2009. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we paid cash interest of $167.0 million, net of capitalized interest. As of September 30, 2008, about 68.3% of our outstanding indebtedness was at fixed interest rates or subject to interest rate protection.
Recent Developments in the Credit Markets
In light of the unprecedented volatility in financial markets, we have performed additional assessments to determine the impact, if any, of recent market developments, including the bankruptcy, restructuring or merging of certain banks and investment banks on our financial position. These assessments have included a review of our continued access to liquidity in the credit markets and counterparty creditworthiness.
In this severely tightened credit environment, we believe we have more than sufficient liquidity to meet our requirements over the next two years. We fund our liquidity needs for capital investment, working capital, and other financial commitments through cash flow from continuing operations and available revolving credit commitments aggregating $809.7 million as of September 30, 2008. We have $24.5 million of remaining debt maturities in 2008, $124.5 million of debt maturities in 2009 and $92.0 million of debt maturities in 2010. At this time, we are not aware of any of our revolver banks being in a position where they would be unable to fund borrowings made under our revolving credit commitments. The turmoil in the financial markets may create additional risks in the foreseeable future, including the failure of additional banks, which could reduce amounts available to us under our revolving credit commitments. While not significant to us thus far, if the financial markets fail to recover over the foreseeable future, we may face higher future borrowing costs associated with our short-term and long-term debt.

 

25


Table of Contents

In addition to the counterparty risk with respect to our revolving credit commitments, we are also subject to credit risk with respect to our interest rate swap agreements with major banks. As of September 30, 2008, our counterparty risk in this area was confined to investment grade financial institutions.
Bank Credit Facilities
Our two principal operating subsidiaries, Mediacom Broadband LLC and Mediacom LLC, maintain in aggregate $3,009.1 million in bank credit facilities, of which $2,135.0 million was outstanding as of September 30, 2008. Continued access to our credit facilities is subject to our remaining in compliance with the covenants of these credit facilities, including covenants tied to our operating performance, principally the requirement that we maintain a maximum ratio of total senior debt to cash flow, as detailed in our credit agreements, of 6.0 to 1.0. The weighted average of our total senior debt to cash flow ratio was 3.9 to 1.0 for the third quarter of 2008. The average interest rates on outstanding debt under our bank credit facilities as of September 30, 2008 and 2007, were 5.0% and 6.8%, respectively, before giving effect to the interest rate exchange agreements discussed below.
As of September 30, 2008, we had unused revolving credit commitments of $854.8 million under our bank credit facilities, $809.7 million of which could be borrowed and used for general corporate purposes based on the terms and conditions of our debt arrangements. As of the same date, $98.5 million of unused revolving credit commitments were subject to scheduled reductions terminating on March 31, 2010; and $350.8 million and $405.5 million of our unused revolving credit commitments expire on September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2012, respectively, and are not subject to scheduled reductions prior to maturity.
On May 29, 2008, the operating subsidiaries of Mediacom Broadband entered into an incremental facility agreement that provides for a new term loan (“new term loan”) under the Broadband credit facility in the principal amount of $350.0 million. On May 29, 2008, the full amount of the $350.0 million new term loan was borrowed by the operating subsidiaries of Mediacom Broadband. Approximately $335.0 million of the proceeds from the new term loan were used to repay the outstanding balance of the revolving credit portion of the Broadband credit facility, without any reduction in the revolving credit commitments. The balance of the proceeds from the new term loan were used for general corporate purposes.
Borrowings under the new term loan bear interest at a floating rate or rates equal to LIBOR or the prime rate, plus a margin of 3.50% for LIBOR loans and a margin of 2.50% for prime rate loans. For the first four years of the new term loan, LIBOR and the prime rate applicable to the new term loan are subject to a minimum of 3.00% in the case of LIBOR and a minimum of 4.00% in the case of the prime rate. The new term loan matures on January 3, 2016. The obligations of the operating subsidiaries under the new term loan are governed by the terms of the Broadband credit facility.
As of September 30, 2008, approximately $19.3 million of letters of credit were issued under our bank credit facilities to various parties as collateral for our performance relating to insurance and franchise requirements.
Interest Rate Exchange Agreements
As of September 30, 2008, we had entered into interest rate exchange agreements with counterparties to hedge $1.1 billion of floating rate debt at a weighted average fixed rate of 5.0%. These agreements are scheduled to expire in the amounts of $800.0 million, $200.0 million and $100.0 million during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively, and have been accounted for on a mark-to-market basis as of, and for the three and nine months ended, September 30, 2008 and 2007. Under the terms of all of our interest rate exchange agreements, we are exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other parties. However, due to the continued high creditworthiness of our counterparties, which are major banking firms with investment grade rankings, we do not anticipate their nonperformance.
In September 2008, we entered into forward starting interest rate exchange agreements that fixed interest rates at a weighted average of approximately 3.2% on $200.0 million of floating rate debt for two years, commencing on May 1, 2009 and approximately 3.7% on $200.0 million of floating rate debt for three years, commencing on June 30, 2009. These agreements have been accounted for on a mark-to-market basis as of, and for the three months ended September 30, 2008.

 

26


Table of Contents

The fair value of the interest rate exchange agreements is the estimated amount that we would receive or pay to terminate such agreements, taking into account market interest rates, the remaining time to maturities and the creditworthiness of our counterparties. As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, based on the mark-to-market valuation, we recorded on our consolidated balance sheets an accumulated liability for derivatives of $21.7 million and $25.8 million, respectively. We recorded in our consolidated statements of operations a net gain on derivatives of $6.0 million and a net loss on derivatives of $13.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. We recorded a net gain on derivatives of $4.1 million and a net loss on derivatives of $9.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase in the current portion of the net accumulated liability for derivatives since June 30, 2008 was driven primarily by a decrease in estimated future interest rates.
Senior Notes
We have issued senior notes through Mediacom Broadband and Mediacom LLC totaling $1.125 billion as of September 30, 2008. The indentures governing our senior notes also contain financial and other covenants, though they are generally less restrictive than those found in our bank credit facilities and do not require us to maintain any financial ratios. Principal covenants include a limitation on the incurrence of additional indebtedness based upon a maximum ratio of total indebtedness to cash flow, as defined in these debt agreements, ranging from 7.0 to 1.0 to 8.5 to 1.0. These agreements also contain limitations on dividends, investments and distributions.
Covenant Compliance and Debt Ratings
For all periods through September 30, 2008, we were in compliance with all of the covenants under our bank credit facilities and senior note arrangements. There are no covenants, events of default, borrowing conditions or other terms in our bank credit facilities and senior note arrangements that are based on changes in our credit rating assigned by any rating agency. We believe that we will not have any difficulty complying with any of the applicable covenants in the foreseeable future.
Operating Activities
Net cash flows provided by operating activities were $188.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, primarily due to Adjusted OIBDA of $382.3 million, offset in part by interest expense of $163.3 million and the $24.8 million net change in our operating assets and liabilities. The net change in our operating assets and liabilities was principally due to a decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $20.1 million, an increase in prepaid expenses and other assets of $4.3 million offset in part by an increase in deferred revenue of $2.9 million.
Net cash flows provided by operating activities were $143.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, primarily due to Adjusted OIBDA of $343.4 million, offset in part by interest expense of $180.2 million and the $17.1 million net change in our operating assets and liabilities. The net change in our operating assets and liabilities was primarily due to an decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $9.9 million, an increase in our accounts receivable, net, of $4.6 million, an increase in our prepaid expenses and other assets of $3.9 million, partially offset by an increase in deferred revenue of $4.0 million.  
Investing Activities
Net cash flows used in investing activities were $217.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Capital expenditures represented all of net cash flow used in investing activities. The increase of $34.3 million in capital expenditures over the prior year period is primarily due to greater investments in customer premise equipment and scalable infrastructure for digital transition deployment and HSD requirements. We expect capital expenditures to be approximately $285 million in 2008; this amount was revised from our previously announced measure of approximately $275 million.
Net cash flows used in investing activities were $157.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Capital expenditures represented most of the net cash flows used in investing activities. Capital expenditures of $182.8 million were offset in part by proceeds received from the sale of cable systems, net of acquisitions, of approximately $25.2 million.
On September 7, 2008, we signed a definitive agreement with Shivers Investments, LLC and Shivers Trading & Operating Company (collectively, “Shivers”), both affiliates of Morris Communications Company, LLC. Under the definitive agreement, we will exchange 100% of the shares of stock of a newly-created subsidiary, which will hold non-strategic cable television systems serving approximately 25,000 basic subscribers, and $110 million of cash, for 28.3 million shares of our Class A common stock held by Shivers.

 

27


Table of Contents

We expect to fund the cash portion of the transaction with cash on hand and borrowings made under our revolving credit commitments. Closing of the transaction is expected around year-end 2008, subject to the receipt of certain regulatory approvals and other customary conditions. As of September 30, 2008, giving pro-forma effect to this stock repurchase, our total outstanding shares would be approximately 66.3 million, representing 39.3 million and 27.0 million of our Class A stock and Class B stock, respectively. Both Morris Communications and Shivers are controlled by William S. Morris III, a member of Mediacom’s Board of Directors.
Financing Activities
Net cash flows provided by financing activities were $42.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, principally due to net bank financing of $45.0 million and other financing activities of $30.6 million, which funded repurchases of our Class A common stock totaling $22.4 million and financing costs of $10.9 million.
Net cash flows used in financing activities were $7.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, primarily due to repurchases of our Class A common stock totaling $39.0 million, and other financing activities of $10.6 million, which were funded by net bank financing of $42.1 million.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
There have been no material changes to our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as previously disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Periodically, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to doubtful accounts, long-lived assets, capitalized costs and accruals. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe that the application of the critical accounting policies requires significant judgments and estimates on the part of management. For a summary of our critical accounting policies, please refer to our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
In accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” the amortization of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets is prohibited and requires such assets to be tested annually for impairment, or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. We have determined that our cable franchise rights and goodwill are indefinite-lived assets and therefore not amortizable.
We directly assess the value of cable franchise rights for impairment under SFAS No. 142 by utilizing a discounted cash flow methodology. In performing an impairment test in accordance with SFAS No. 142, we make assumptions, such as future cash flow expectations and other future benefits related to cable franchise rights, which are consistent with the expectations of buyers and sellers of cable systems in determining fair value. If the determined fair value of our cable franchise rights is less than the carrying amount on the financial statements, an impairment charge would be recognized for the difference between the fair value and the carrying value of such assets.
Goodwill impairment is determined using a two-step process. The first step compares the fair value of a reporting unit with our carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds our carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired and the second step is unnecessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds our fair value, the second step is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill, calculated using the residual method, with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds the implied fair value, the excess is recognized as an impairment loss. We conduct our annual impairment test as of October 1, 2008.

 

28


Table of Contents

Our Class A common stock price has had significant volatility during September and October 2008, largely caused by a precipitous drop in equity securities’ prices across all sectors of the United States. We do not believe that our stock price is the sole indicator of the underlying value of the assets in our reporting units. In addition, there has not been a material decline in the fundamentals of our business. We have therefore determined that this short-term volatility in our stock price does not qualify as a triggering event under SFAS No. 142 and, as such, no interim impairment test is required as of September 30, 2008.
The economic conditions currently affecting the U.S. economy and how that may impact the fundamentals of our business, together with the recent decline in our stock price, may have a negative impact on the fair values of the assets in our reporting units. This may result in the recognition of an impairment loss when we perform our annual impairment testing during the fourth quarter of 2008.
Inflation and Changing Prices
Our systems’ costs and expenses are subject to inflation and price fluctuations. Such changes in costs and expenses can generally be passed through to subscribers. Programming costs have historically increased at rates in excess of inflation and are expected to continue to do so. We believe that under the Federal Communications Commission’s existing cable rate regulations we may increase rates for cable television services to more than cover any increases in programming. However, competitive conditions and other factors in the marketplace may limit our ability to increase our rates.

 

29


Table of Contents

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
There have been no significant changes to the information required under this Item from what was disclosed in Item 7A of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2008.
There has not been any change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended September 30, 2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
See Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There have been no material changes in the risk factors from those disclosed in Item 1A of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Not applicable.
ITEM 3. DEFAULT UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not applicable.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Not applicable.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.

 

30


Table of Contents

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
         
Exhibit    
Number   Exhibit Description
       
 
  2.1    
Share Exchange Agreement, dated as of September 7, 2008, by and between Mediacom Communications Corporation, Shivers Investments, LLC, and Shivers Trading & Operating Company (1)
       
 
  2.2    
Significant Stockholder Agreement, dated as of September 7, 2008 by and between Mediacom Communications Corporation and Rocco B. Commisso (1)
       
 
  31.1    
Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications
       
 
  32.1    
Section 1350 Certifications
     
(1)  
Filed on September 10, 2008 as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K, dated September 7, 2008, of Mediacom Communications Corporation and incorporated herein by reference.

 

31


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
         
  MEDIACOM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
 
 
November 7, 2008  By:   /s/ Mark E. Stephan    
    Mark E. Stephan   
    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   

 

32


Table of Contents

         
EXHIBIT INDEX
     
Exhibit No.   Description
   
 
Exhibit 2.1:  
Share Exchange Agreement, dated as of September 7, 2008, by and between Mediacom Communications Corporation, Shivers Investments, LLC, and Shivers Trading & Operating Company (1)
   
 
Exhibit 2.2:  
Significant Stockholder Agreement, dated as of September 7, 2008 by and between Mediacom Communications Corporation and Rocco B. Commisso (1)
   
 
Exhibit 31.1:  
Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications
   
 
Exhibit 32.1:  
Section 1350 Certifications
     
(1)  
Filed on September 10, 2008 as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K, dated September 7, 2008, of Mediacom Communications Corporation and incorporated herein by reference.

 

33

Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Rocco B. Commisso, certify that:
(1) I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Mediacom Communications Corporation;
(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
(4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
(5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
         
November 7, 2008  By:   /s/ Rocco B. Commisso    
    Rocco B. Commisso   
    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer   

 

 


 

Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Mark E. Stephan, certify that:
(1) I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Mediacom Communications Corporation;
(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
(4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
(5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
         
November 7, 2008  By:   /s/ Mark E. Stephan    
    Mark E. Stephan   
    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   

 

 

Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance
         
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mediacom Communications Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Rocco B. Commisso, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Mark E. Stephan, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,
(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
         
November 7, 2008
  By:   /s/ Rocco B. Commisso
 
       
 
      Rocco B. Commisso
 
      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 
       
 
  By:   /s/ Mark E. Stephan
 
       
 
      Mark E. Stephan
 
      Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer